The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures

Abstract Introduction The objective of this retrospective non-randomized study was to evaluate the portal of Neviaser (PN) as an alternative approach in antegrade humeral nailing. Methods The surgical approach for the straight antegrade intramedullary nail (SAIN) was either the anterolateral delta-s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Torsten Gerich, Caroline Mouton, Lea Jabbarian, Jean-Paul Weydert, Alexander Hoffmann, Dietrich Pape, Romain Seil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-02-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40634-020-00222-0
id doaj-181d85585d384404ab3182ad0bdff725
record_format Article
spelling doaj-181d85585d384404ab3182ad0bdff7252020-11-25T03:35:37ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532020-02-01711910.1186/s40634-020-00222-0The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fracturesTorsten Gerich0Caroline Mouton1Lea Jabbarian2Jean-Paul Weydert3Alexander Hoffmann4Dietrich Pape5Romain Seil6Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MCDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgAbstract Introduction The objective of this retrospective non-randomized study was to evaluate the portal of Neviaser (PN) as an alternative approach in antegrade humeral nailing. Methods The surgical approach for the straight antegrade intramedullary nail (SAIN) was either the anterolateral delta-split (group 2, n = 79) or the portal of Neviaser (group 3, n = 27). Length of surgery and time of radiation were extracted from charts. Patients stabilized using the PN were followed for a clinical and radiological exam. At follow-up we evaluated the DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and CMS (Constant-Murley Score). Results Between 10.2015 and 12.2018 191 proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures were operated using either an angular stable extramedullary device (group 1, PHILOS®, n = 85) or a straight humeral nail (MultiLoc®, n = 106). Time of radiation and intervention followed a normal distribution. The mean length of surgery was 172.9 min (SD 91.5) in group 1, 121.5 min (SD 54.1) in group 2 and 96.4 min (SD 33.7) in group 3 (p < 0.01). Time of radiation was significantly different with 1.1 min (SD 0.6: group 1), 3.1 min (SD 1.6: group 2) and 2.9 min (SD 1.7: group 3) (p < 0.01). After a mean interval of 21.5 months (range 6–43 months) 14 / 27 patients of group 3 were available for a clinical and radiological follow-up. The mean DASH in group 3 was 25, the CMS reached 70. The age and sex weighted CMS mean value was 96%. Forward flexion was 131°, abduction 125°. The ratio of strength affected versus non-affected side was 4.4: 6.2 kg. Conclusions The portal of Neviaser is a feasible and safe approach and is an alternative to the anterolateral delta-split. Length of surgery and time of radiation were significantly shorter. Level of evidence IVhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40634-020-00222-0RetrospectiveNon-randomizedHumerus fractureStraight nailNeviaserRotator cuff
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Torsten Gerich
Caroline Mouton
Lea Jabbarian
Jean-Paul Weydert
Alexander Hoffmann
Dietrich Pape
Romain Seil
spellingShingle Torsten Gerich
Caroline Mouton
Lea Jabbarian
Jean-Paul Weydert
Alexander Hoffmann
Dietrich Pape
Romain Seil
The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Retrospective
Non-randomized
Humerus fracture
Straight nail
Neviaser
Rotator cuff
author_facet Torsten Gerich
Caroline Mouton
Lea Jabbarian
Jean-Paul Weydert
Alexander Hoffmann
Dietrich Pape
Romain Seil
author_sort Torsten Gerich
title The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
title_short The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
title_full The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
title_fullStr The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
title_full_unstemmed The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
title_sort portal of neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
issn 2197-1153
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Introduction The objective of this retrospective non-randomized study was to evaluate the portal of Neviaser (PN) as an alternative approach in antegrade humeral nailing. Methods The surgical approach for the straight antegrade intramedullary nail (SAIN) was either the anterolateral delta-split (group 2, n = 79) or the portal of Neviaser (group 3, n = 27). Length of surgery and time of radiation were extracted from charts. Patients stabilized using the PN were followed for a clinical and radiological exam. At follow-up we evaluated the DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and CMS (Constant-Murley Score). Results Between 10.2015 and 12.2018 191 proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures were operated using either an angular stable extramedullary device (group 1, PHILOS®, n = 85) or a straight humeral nail (MultiLoc®, n = 106). Time of radiation and intervention followed a normal distribution. The mean length of surgery was 172.9 min (SD 91.5) in group 1, 121.5 min (SD 54.1) in group 2 and 96.4 min (SD 33.7) in group 3 (p < 0.01). Time of radiation was significantly different with 1.1 min (SD 0.6: group 1), 3.1 min (SD 1.6: group 2) and 2.9 min (SD 1.7: group 3) (p < 0.01). After a mean interval of 21.5 months (range 6–43 months) 14 / 27 patients of group 3 were available for a clinical and radiological follow-up. The mean DASH in group 3 was 25, the CMS reached 70. The age and sex weighted CMS mean value was 96%. Forward flexion was 131°, abduction 125°. The ratio of strength affected versus non-affected side was 4.4: 6.2 kg. Conclusions The portal of Neviaser is a feasible and safe approach and is an alternative to the anterolateral delta-split. Length of surgery and time of radiation were significantly shorter. Level of evidence IV
topic Retrospective
Non-randomized
Humerus fracture
Straight nail
Neviaser
Rotator cuff
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40634-020-00222-0
work_keys_str_mv AT torstengerich theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT carolinemouton theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT leajabbarian theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT jeanpaulweydert theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT alexanderhoffmann theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT dietrichpape theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT romainseil theportalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT torstengerich portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT carolinemouton portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT leajabbarian portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT jeanpaulweydert portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT alexanderhoffmann portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT dietrichpape portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
AT romainseil portalofneviaseravalidoptionforantegradenailingofhumerusfractures
_version_ 1724553368984092672