FURTHER ADVENTURES IN MARS DTM QUALITY: SMOOTHING ERRORS, SHARPENING DETAILS

• Main Authors: R. L. Kirk, D. Mayer, B. L. Redding, D. M. Galuszka, R. L. Fergason, T. M. Hare, K. Gwinner
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-06-01
• Series: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
• Online Access: https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLIII-B3-2021/659/2021/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-659-2021.pdf

We have used high-precision, high-resolution digital terrain models (DTMs) of the NASA Mars Science Laboratory and Mars 2020 rover landing sites based on mosaicked images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (MRO HiRISE) camera as a reference data set to evaluate DTMs based on Mars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera (MEX HRSC) images. The Next Generation Automatic Terrain Extraction (NGATE) matcher in the SOCET SET/GXP® commercial photogram- metric system produces DTMs with relatively good (small) horizontal resolution but high error, and results are terrain dependent, with poorer resolution and smaller errors on smoother surfaces. Multiple approaches to smoothing the NGATE DTMs give very similar tradeoffs between resolution and error. Smoothing the NGATE DTMs with a 5x5 lowpass filter is near optimal in terms of both combined resolution-error performance and local slope estimation, but smoothing with a single pass of an area-based matcher, which has been the standard approach for generating planetary DTMs at the U.S. Geological Survey to date results in similar errors and only slightly worse resolution. DTMs from the HRSC team processing pipeline fall within this same trade space but are less sensitive to terrain roughness. DTMs produced with the Ames Stereo Pipeline also fall in this space at resolutions intermediate between NGATE and the team pipeline. Although DTM resolution and error each vary by a factor of 2, the product of resolution and error is much more consistent, varying by ≤20% across multiple image sets and matching algorithms. Refinement of the stereo DTM by photoclinometry can yield significant quantitative improvement in resolution and some improvement in error (improving their product by as much as a factor of 2), provided that albedo variations over distances smaller than the stereo DTM resolution are not too severe.