Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy of bone regeneration for treatment of peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Electronic search of the literature was performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and case series on treatment of peri-impla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khadija Amine, Youssef Radaj, Amina Gharibi, Jamila Kissa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/2859
id doaj-182b3da16c3a4689bf7b18b7590b4df4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-182b3da16c3a4689bf7b18b7590b4df42021-09-11T04:26:27ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2021-01-011710.18502/fid.v17i38.5291Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic ReviewKhadija Amine0Youssef Radaj1Amina Gharibi2Jamila Kissa3Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hassan II of Casablanca, MoroccoFaculty of Dentistry, University Hassan II of Casablanca, MoroccoDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hassan II of Casablanca, MoroccoDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Morocco Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy of bone regeneration for treatment of peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Electronic search of the literature was performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and case series on treatment of peri-implantitis using bone regeneration procedures with at least 6 months of follow-up. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) were applied. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool. Results: Two RCTs and 16 case series with a total of 520 treated patients (2002 implants) were included. Bone regenerative procedures showed controversial results regarding bone fill. Two studies reported statistically significant bone gain while four studies reported insignificant bone gain. Other studies reported bone gain with no P value. Pocket depth (PD) reduction varied among the studies since four studies reported a significant reduction in PD while four others reported insignificant reduction in PD. Other studies reported a reduction in PD with no P value. Bone regeneration procedures seemed to decrease bleeding on probing (BOP) but they did not seem conducive to increase the width of keratinized gingiva. Increased keratinized gingiva was noted in cases with subepithelial grafts. Conclusion: Evaluation of the effectiveness of bone regeneration techniques in this systematic review presented limitations related to heterogeneity in patient selection (age, history of periodontitis, smoking status and implant system), means of disinfection and decontamination, and variability of the materials used for treatment. https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/2859Peri-implantitisDental ImplantationEndosseousDental ImplantsGuided Tissue RegenerationBonegraft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khadija Amine
Youssef Radaj
Amina Gharibi
Jamila Kissa
spellingShingle Khadija Amine
Youssef Radaj
Amina Gharibi
Jamila Kissa
Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review
Frontiers in Dentistry
Peri-implantitis
Dental Implantation
Endosseous
Dental Implants
Guided Tissue Regeneration
Bonegraft
author_facet Khadija Amine
Youssef Radaj
Amina Gharibi
Jamila Kissa
author_sort Khadija Amine
title Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review
title_short Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review
title_full Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review
title_sort regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis: a systematic review
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Frontiers in Dentistry
issn 2676-296X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy of bone regeneration for treatment of peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Electronic search of the literature was performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and case series on treatment of peri-implantitis using bone regeneration procedures with at least 6 months of follow-up. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) were applied. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool. Results: Two RCTs and 16 case series with a total of 520 treated patients (2002 implants) were included. Bone regenerative procedures showed controversial results regarding bone fill. Two studies reported statistically significant bone gain while four studies reported insignificant bone gain. Other studies reported bone gain with no P value. Pocket depth (PD) reduction varied among the studies since four studies reported a significant reduction in PD while four others reported insignificant reduction in PD. Other studies reported a reduction in PD with no P value. Bone regeneration procedures seemed to decrease bleeding on probing (BOP) but they did not seem conducive to increase the width of keratinized gingiva. Increased keratinized gingiva was noted in cases with subepithelial grafts. Conclusion: Evaluation of the effectiveness of bone regeneration techniques in this systematic review presented limitations related to heterogeneity in patient selection (age, history of periodontitis, smoking status and implant system), means of disinfection and decontamination, and variability of the materials used for treatment.
topic Peri-implantitis
Dental Implantation
Endosseous
Dental Implants
Guided Tissue Regeneration
Bonegraft
url https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/2859
work_keys_str_mv AT khadijaamine regenerativetreatmentofperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT youssefradaj regenerativetreatmentofperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT aminagharibi regenerativetreatmentofperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT jamilakissa regenerativetreatmentofperiimplantitisasystematicreview
_version_ 1717757364962066432