The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.

This paper provides an institutional and empirical analysis of the highly concentrated market of academic publishing, characterized by over proportionally high profit margins for publishing companies. The availability of latest research findings is an important issue for researchers, universities an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephan Puehringer, Johanna Rath, Teresa Griesebner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253226
id doaj-183fa1e5ab0948daabd0f34dc65c795e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-183fa1e5ab0948daabd0f34dc65c795e2021-07-02T04:31:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025322610.1371/journal.pone.0253226The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.Stephan PuehringerJohanna RathTeresa GriesebnerThis paper provides an institutional and empirical analysis of the highly concentrated market of academic publishing, characterized by over proportionally high profit margins for publishing companies. The availability of latest research findings is an important issue for researchers, universities and politicians alike. Open access (OA) publication provides a promising but also costly solution to overcome this problem. However, in this paper we argue that OA publication costs are an important, but by far not the only way for academic publishers to gain access to public funding. In contrast, our study provides a comprehensive overview of the channels through which public expenditure benefits big academic publishing companies. Furthermore, we offer the results of an explorative case study, where we estimate the annual financial flows of public expenditures in Austria for the field of social sciences. In all, these expenditures add up to about 66.55 to 103.2 million € a year, which amounts to a fourth of total public funding for this field. Against this background, we contribute to the debate whether and to what extent public subsidies are justified for economically successful companies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253226
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephan Puehringer
Johanna Rath
Teresa Griesebner
spellingShingle Stephan Puehringer
Johanna Rath
Teresa Griesebner
The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stephan Puehringer
Johanna Rath
Teresa Griesebner
author_sort Stephan Puehringer
title The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.
title_short The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.
title_full The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.
title_fullStr The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.
title_full_unstemmed The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good.
title_sort political economy of academic publishing: on the commodification of a public good.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description This paper provides an institutional and empirical analysis of the highly concentrated market of academic publishing, characterized by over proportionally high profit margins for publishing companies. The availability of latest research findings is an important issue for researchers, universities and politicians alike. Open access (OA) publication provides a promising but also costly solution to overcome this problem. However, in this paper we argue that OA publication costs are an important, but by far not the only way for academic publishers to gain access to public funding. In contrast, our study provides a comprehensive overview of the channels through which public expenditure benefits big academic publishing companies. Furthermore, we offer the results of an explorative case study, where we estimate the annual financial flows of public expenditures in Austria for the field of social sciences. In all, these expenditures add up to about 66.55 to 103.2 million € a year, which amounts to a fourth of total public funding for this field. Against this background, we contribute to the debate whether and to what extent public subsidies are justified for economically successful companies.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253226
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanpuehringer thepoliticaleconomyofacademicpublishingonthecommodificationofapublicgood
AT johannarath thepoliticaleconomyofacademicpublishingonthecommodificationofapublicgood
AT teresagriesebner thepoliticaleconomyofacademicpublishingonthecommodificationofapublicgood
AT stephanpuehringer politicaleconomyofacademicpublishingonthecommodificationofapublicgood
AT johannarath politicaleconomyofacademicpublishingonthecommodificationofapublicgood
AT teresagriesebner politicaleconomyofacademicpublishingonthecommodificationofapublicgood
_version_ 1714481292570001408