Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krivokapic Zoran V, Barisic Goran I, Lazovic Ranko G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-12-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/10/141
id doaj-1846f35d9289452c8edecdea429eedf4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1846f35d9289452c8edecdea429eedf42020-11-25T03:45:19ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2010-12-0110114110.1186/1471-230X-10-141Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approachKrivokapic Zoran VBarisic Goran ILazovic Ranko G<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar.</p> <p>In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/10/141
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krivokapic Zoran V
Barisic Goran I
Lazovic Ranko G
spellingShingle Krivokapic Zoran V
Barisic Goran I
Lazovic Ranko G
Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
BMC Gastroenterology
author_facet Krivokapic Zoran V
Barisic Goran I
Lazovic Ranko G
author_sort Krivokapic Zoran V
title Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_short Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_full Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_fullStr Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_full_unstemmed Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_sort primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2010-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar.</p> <p>In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/10/141
work_keys_str_mv AT krivokapiczoranv primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach
AT barisicgorani primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach
AT lazovicrankog primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach
_version_ 1724510162869288960