Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests

The fracturing behavior of layered rocks is usually influenced by bedding planes. In this paper, five groups of bedded sandstones with different bedding inclination angles θ are used to carry out impact compression tests by split Hopkinson pressure bar. A high-speed camera is used to capture the fra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiadong Qiu, Diyuan Li, Xibing Li, Zilong Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7687802
id doaj-18789d38621f44799622db9e5fad1794
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18789d38621f44799622db9e5fad17942020-11-24T21:54:36ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032017-01-01201710.1155/2017/76878027687802Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB TestsJiadong Qiu0Diyuan Li1Xibing Li2Zilong Zhou3School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, ChinaSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, ChinaSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, ChinaSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, ChinaThe fracturing behavior of layered rocks is usually influenced by bedding planes. In this paper, five groups of bedded sandstones with different bedding inclination angles θ are used to carry out impact compression tests by split Hopkinson pressure bar. A high-speed camera is used to capture the fracturing process of specimens. Based on testing results, three failure patterns are identified and classified, including (A) splitting along bedding planes; (B) sliding failure along bedding planes; (C) fracturing across bedding planes. The failure pattern (C) can be further classified into three subcategories: (C1) fracturing oblique to loading direction; (C2) fracturing parallel to loading direction; (C3) mixed fracturing across bedding planes. Meanwhile, a numerical model of layered rock and SHPB system are established by particle flow code (PFC). The numerical results show that the shear stress is the main reason for inducing the damage along bedding plane at θ = 0°~75°. Both tensile stress and shear stress on bedding planes contribute to the splitting failure along bedding planes when the inclination angle is 90°. Besides, tensile stress is the main reason that leads to the damage in rock matrixes at θ = 0°~90°.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7687802
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiadong Qiu
Diyuan Li
Xibing Li
Zilong Zhou
spellingShingle Jiadong Qiu
Diyuan Li
Xibing Li
Zilong Zhou
Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests
Shock and Vibration
author_facet Jiadong Qiu
Diyuan Li
Xibing Li
Zilong Zhou
author_sort Jiadong Qiu
title Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests
title_short Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests
title_full Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests
title_fullStr Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Fracturing Behavior of Layered Rock with Different Inclination Angles in SHPB Tests
title_sort dynamic fracturing behavior of layered rock with different inclination angles in shpb tests
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Shock and Vibration
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The fracturing behavior of layered rocks is usually influenced by bedding planes. In this paper, five groups of bedded sandstones with different bedding inclination angles θ are used to carry out impact compression tests by split Hopkinson pressure bar. A high-speed camera is used to capture the fracturing process of specimens. Based on testing results, three failure patterns are identified and classified, including (A) splitting along bedding planes; (B) sliding failure along bedding planes; (C) fracturing across bedding planes. The failure pattern (C) can be further classified into three subcategories: (C1) fracturing oblique to loading direction; (C2) fracturing parallel to loading direction; (C3) mixed fracturing across bedding planes. Meanwhile, a numerical model of layered rock and SHPB system are established by particle flow code (PFC). The numerical results show that the shear stress is the main reason for inducing the damage along bedding plane at θ = 0°~75°. Both tensile stress and shear stress on bedding planes contribute to the splitting failure along bedding planes when the inclination angle is 90°. Besides, tensile stress is the main reason that leads to the damage in rock matrixes at θ = 0°~90°.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7687802
work_keys_str_mv AT jiadongqiu dynamicfracturingbehavioroflayeredrockwithdifferentinclinationanglesinshpbtests
AT diyuanli dynamicfracturingbehavioroflayeredrockwithdifferentinclinationanglesinshpbtests
AT xibingli dynamicfracturingbehavioroflayeredrockwithdifferentinclinationanglesinshpbtests
AT zilongzhou dynamicfracturingbehavioroflayeredrockwithdifferentinclinationanglesinshpbtests
_version_ 1725866982044073984