Biosafety initiatives in BMENA region: identification of gaps and advances

AbstractIntroduction: The objectives of this study were to identify and assess the impact of capacity-building biosafety initiatives and programs that have taken place in the broader Middle East and north Africa (BMENA) region between 2001-13, to highlight gaps that require further development, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erum eKhan, Nayla eAhmed, Khalid Riffi Temsamani, Atef eElGendy, Murray eCohen, Ariba eHasan, Hilliard eGastfriend, Jennifer eCole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00044/full
Description
Summary:AbstractIntroduction: The objectives of this study were to identify and assess the impact of capacity-building biosafety initiatives and programs that have taken place in the broader Middle East and north Africa (BMENA) region between 2001-13, to highlight gaps that require further development, and to suggest sustainable ways to build cooperative regional biosafety opportunities. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted with two aspects 1) thorough desktop review of literature for all biosafety / biosecurity related activities in the study countries such as seminars, conferences, workshops, policy documents, technology transfer, sustained scientific endeavours between countries etc.; and 2) an online survey of scientists in countries in the region to get first-hand information about biosafety and biosecurity initiatives and gaps in their country. Results: A total of 1832 initiatives of biosafety / biosecurity were recorded from 97 web-links,70.68% (n=1295) initiatives were focused on raising general awareness among the scientific community about biosafety/biosecurity/biocontainment. The most frequent areas of interest were biorisk management in biomedical and biotechnology laboratories 13% (n=239), followed by Living Modified Organisms (LMO’s) 9.17% (n=168). Hands-on training accounted for 2.67% (n=49) of initiatives. On line survey results confirmed desktop review findings, however the response rate was 11%.
ISSN:2296-2565