Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.

To explore the effectiveness of using a series of tests combining near visual acuity (NVA) and distance visual acuity (DVA) for large-scale screenings for significant refractive error (SRE) in primary school children.Each participant underwent DVA, NVA and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements. SR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peiyao Jin, Jianfeng Zhu, Haidong Zou, Lina Lu, Huijuan Zhao, Qiangqiang Li, Xiangui He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4331083?pdf=render
id doaj-189aa8fb7f534e3aaa185cdf1eb50797
record_format Article
spelling doaj-189aa8fb7f534e3aaa185cdf1eb507972020-11-25T02:47:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01102e011739910.1371/journal.pone.0117399Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.Peiyao JinJianfeng ZhuHaidong ZouLina LuHuijuan ZhaoQiangqiang LiXiangui HeTo explore the effectiveness of using a series of tests combining near visual acuity (NVA) and distance visual acuity (DVA) for large-scale screenings for significant refractive error (SRE) in primary school children.Each participant underwent DVA, NVA and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements. SREs, including high myopia, high hyperopia and high astigmatism were analyzed. Cycloplegic refraction results were considered to be the gold standard for the comparison of different screening measurements. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to compare the area under the curve (AUC) and the Youden index among DVA, NVA and the series combined tests of DVA and NVA. The efficacies (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of each test were evaluated. Only the right eye data of each participant were analysed for statistical purpose.A total of 4416 children aged 6 to 12 years completed the study, among which 486 students had right eye SRE (SRE prevalence rate = 11.01%). There was no difference in the prevalence of high hyperopia and high astigmatism among different age groups. However, the prevalence of high myopia significantly increased with the age (χ² = 381.81, p<0.01). High hyperopia was the biggest SRE factor associated with amblyopia(p<0.01,OR = 167.40, 95% CI: 75.14∼372.94). The DVA test was better than the NVA test for detecting high myopia (Z = 2.71, p<0.01), but the NVA test was better for detecting high hyperopia (Z = 2.35, p = 0.02) and high astigmatism (Z = 4.45, p<0.01). The series combined DVA and NVA test had the biggest AUC and the highest Youden Index for detecting high hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, as well as all of the SREs (all p<0.01).The series combined DVA and NVA test was more accurate for detecting SREs than either of the two tests alone. This new method could be applied to large-scale SRE screening of children, aged 6 to 12, in areas that are less developed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4331083?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peiyao Jin
Jianfeng Zhu
Haidong Zou
Lina Lu
Huijuan Zhao
Qiangqiang Li
Xiangui He
spellingShingle Peiyao Jin
Jianfeng Zhu
Haidong Zou
Lina Lu
Huijuan Zhao
Qiangqiang Li
Xiangui He
Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Peiyao Jin
Jianfeng Zhu
Haidong Zou
Lina Lu
Huijuan Zhao
Qiangqiang Li
Xiangui He
author_sort Peiyao Jin
title Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
title_short Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
title_full Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
title_fullStr Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
title_full_unstemmed Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
title_sort screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description To explore the effectiveness of using a series of tests combining near visual acuity (NVA) and distance visual acuity (DVA) for large-scale screenings for significant refractive error (SRE) in primary school children.Each participant underwent DVA, NVA and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements. SREs, including high myopia, high hyperopia and high astigmatism were analyzed. Cycloplegic refraction results were considered to be the gold standard for the comparison of different screening measurements. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to compare the area under the curve (AUC) and the Youden index among DVA, NVA and the series combined tests of DVA and NVA. The efficacies (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of each test were evaluated. Only the right eye data of each participant were analysed for statistical purpose.A total of 4416 children aged 6 to 12 years completed the study, among which 486 students had right eye SRE (SRE prevalence rate = 11.01%). There was no difference in the prevalence of high hyperopia and high astigmatism among different age groups. However, the prevalence of high myopia significantly increased with the age (χ² = 381.81, p<0.01). High hyperopia was the biggest SRE factor associated with amblyopia(p<0.01,OR = 167.40, 95% CI: 75.14∼372.94). The DVA test was better than the NVA test for detecting high myopia (Z = 2.71, p<0.01), but the NVA test was better for detecting high hyperopia (Z = 2.35, p = 0.02) and high astigmatism (Z = 4.45, p<0.01). The series combined DVA and NVA test had the biggest AUC and the highest Youden Index for detecting high hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, as well as all of the SREs (all p<0.01).The series combined DVA and NVA test was more accurate for detecting SREs than either of the two tests alone. This new method could be applied to large-scale SRE screening of children, aged 6 to 12, in areas that are less developed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4331083?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT peiyaojin screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
AT jianfengzhu screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
AT haidongzou screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
AT linalu screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
AT huijuanzhao screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
AT qiangqiangli screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
AT xianguihe screeningforsignificantrefractiveerrorusingacombinationofdistancevisualacuityandnearvisualacuity
_version_ 1724754013422878720