Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach

The article explores the ways to solve the problem of the lack of a common interdisciplinary definition of myth at the beginning of the 21st century. The problem was actualized in the 20th century after the development of new theories that reject the enlightening stereotypes of archaic nature of myt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oleksandr Siedin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy 2019-12-01
Series:Наукові записки НаУКМА: Філософія та релігієзнавство
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nzpr.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/186443
id doaj-18e9e37e47414874b4b42bdfc8b628e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18e9e37e47414874b4b42bdfc8b628e82021-06-15T11:45:28ZengNational University of Kyiv-Mohyla AcademyНаукові записки НаУКМА: Філософія та релігієзнавство2617-16782019-12-0145866https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2019.4.58-66Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive ApproachOleksandr Siedin0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9943-8907National University of Kyiv-Mohyla AcademyThe article explores the ways to solve the problem of the lack of a common interdisciplinary definition of myth at the beginning of the 21st century. The problem was actualized in the 20th century after the development of new theories that reject the enlightening stereotypes of archaic nature of myth, and instead develop the ideas about the existence of modern mythology, the inability to escape from myth and its active participation in the formation of the current worldview. A number of contemporary researchers have been attempting to evade a common ultimate definition of myth in favour of forming a productive, inclusive discourse. So, there are attempts to refrain from defining myth at all (Omid Tofighian), to elaborate a compromise definition (Robert Segal), to define not a myth but a “work on myth” (Hans Blumenberg, Chiara Bottici), to evolve a detailed but flexible definition that is open to adjustments (William Doty). These investigations ground an interdisciplinary theoretical foundation that can be used for further studies of the mythic phenomena in each individual perspective, without neglecting the achievements of various discourses. It is also noticed that a common feature of contemporary efforts to define a myth is an observation that we always deal with a myth not as an isolated story but simultaneously with the diversity of its plots and manifestations. The studies focus on its multiplicity, variability, modifiability through time. The other important side of myth is significance that it produces for both universal and specific aspects of the life of social groups. If the narrative stops producing significance, it loses its mythic status and transforms into the products of the mythology of other epochs.http://nzpr.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/186443mythmythologywork on mythdefinition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oleksandr Siedin
spellingShingle Oleksandr Siedin
Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach
Наукові записки НаУКМА: Філософія та релігієзнавство
myth
mythology
work on myth
definition
author_facet Oleksandr Siedin
author_sort Oleksandr Siedin
title Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach
title_short Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach
title_full Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach
title_fullStr Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach
title_full_unstemmed Definition of Myth: on the Road to Inclusive Approach
title_sort definition of myth: on the road to inclusive approach
publisher National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy
series Наукові записки НаУКМА: Філософія та релігієзнавство
issn 2617-1678
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The article explores the ways to solve the problem of the lack of a common interdisciplinary definition of myth at the beginning of the 21st century. The problem was actualized in the 20th century after the development of new theories that reject the enlightening stereotypes of archaic nature of myth, and instead develop the ideas about the existence of modern mythology, the inability to escape from myth and its active participation in the formation of the current worldview. A number of contemporary researchers have been attempting to evade a common ultimate definition of myth in favour of forming a productive, inclusive discourse. So, there are attempts to refrain from defining myth at all (Omid Tofighian), to elaborate a compromise definition (Robert Segal), to define not a myth but a “work on myth” (Hans Blumenberg, Chiara Bottici), to evolve a detailed but flexible definition that is open to adjustments (William Doty). These investigations ground an interdisciplinary theoretical foundation that can be used for further studies of the mythic phenomena in each individual perspective, without neglecting the achievements of various discourses. It is also noticed that a common feature of contemporary efforts to define a myth is an observation that we always deal with a myth not as an isolated story but simultaneously with the diversity of its plots and manifestations. The studies focus on its multiplicity, variability, modifiability through time. The other important side of myth is significance that it produces for both universal and specific aspects of the life of social groups. If the narrative stops producing significance, it loses its mythic status and transforms into the products of the mythology of other epochs.
topic myth
mythology
work on myth
definition
url http://nzpr.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/186443
work_keys_str_mv AT oleksandrsiedin definitionofmythontheroadtoinclusiveapproach
_version_ 1721376459076927488