Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated comparatively the surface roughness of four orthodontic band cements after storage in various solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight standardized cylinders were made from 4 materials: zinc phosphate cement (ZP), compomer (C), resin-modified glass ionomer cemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Françoise Hélène van de Sande, Adriana Fernandes da Silva, Douver Michelon, Evandro Piva, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci, Flávio Fernando Demarco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2011-06-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000300008
id doaj-18fcff9854724bd29e31349a20faf58d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18fcff9854724bd29e31349a20faf58d2020-11-25T01:09:45ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652011-06-0119322322710.1590/S1678-77572011000300008Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositionsFrançoise Hélène van de SandeAdriana Fernandes da SilvaDouver MichelonEvandro PivaMaximiliano Sérgio CenciFlávio Fernando DemarcoOBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated comparatively the surface roughness of four orthodontic band cements after storage in various solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight standardized cylinders were made from 4 materials: zinc phosphate cement (ZP), compomer (C), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resin cement (RC). Specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water and immersed in saline (pH 7.0) or 0.1 M lactic acid solution (pH 4.0) for 15 days. Surface roughness readings were taken with a profilometer (Surfcorder SE1200) before and after the storage period. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (comparison among cements and storage solutions) or paired t-test (comparison before and after the storage period) at 5% significance level. RESULTS: The values for average surface roughness were statistically different (p<0.001) among cements at both baseline and after storage. The roughness values of cements in a decreasing order were ZP>RMGIC>C>R (p<0.001). After 15 days, immersion in lactic acid solution resulted in the highest surface roughness for all cements (p<0.05), except for the RC group (p>0.05). Compared to the current threshold (0.2 µm) related to biofilm accumulation, both RC and C remained below the threshold, even after acidic challenge by immersion in lactic acid solution. CONCLUSIONS: Storage time and immersion in lactic acid solution increased the surface roughness of the majority of the tested cements. RC presented the smoothest surface and it was not influenced by storage conditions.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000300008Resin cementsDental materials
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Françoise Hélène van de Sande
Adriana Fernandes da Silva
Douver Michelon
Evandro Piva
Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Flávio Fernando Demarco
spellingShingle Françoise Hélène van de Sande
Adriana Fernandes da Silva
Douver Michelon
Evandro Piva
Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Flávio Fernando Demarco
Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Resin cements
Dental materials
author_facet Françoise Hélène van de Sande
Adriana Fernandes da Silva
Douver Michelon
Evandro Piva
Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Flávio Fernando Demarco
author_sort Françoise Hélène van de Sande
title Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_short Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_full Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_fullStr Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
title_sort surface roughness of orthodontic band cements with different compositions
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
publishDate 2011-06-01
description OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated comparatively the surface roughness of four orthodontic band cements after storage in various solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight standardized cylinders were made from 4 materials: zinc phosphate cement (ZP), compomer (C), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resin cement (RC). Specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water and immersed in saline (pH 7.0) or 0.1 M lactic acid solution (pH 4.0) for 15 days. Surface roughness readings were taken with a profilometer (Surfcorder SE1200) before and after the storage period. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (comparison among cements and storage solutions) or paired t-test (comparison before and after the storage period) at 5% significance level. RESULTS: The values for average surface roughness were statistically different (p<0.001) among cements at both baseline and after storage. The roughness values of cements in a decreasing order were ZP>RMGIC>C>R (p<0.001). After 15 days, immersion in lactic acid solution resulted in the highest surface roughness for all cements (p<0.05), except for the RC group (p>0.05). Compared to the current threshold (0.2 µm) related to biofilm accumulation, both RC and C remained below the threshold, even after acidic challenge by immersion in lactic acid solution. CONCLUSIONS: Storage time and immersion in lactic acid solution increased the surface roughness of the majority of the tested cements. RC presented the smoothest surface and it was not influenced by storage conditions.
topic Resin cements
Dental materials
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000300008
work_keys_str_mv AT francoisehelenevandesande surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT adrianafernandesdasilva surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT douvermichelon surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT evandropiva surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT maximilianosergiocenci surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
AT flaviofernandodemarco surfaceroughnessoforthodonticbandcementswithdifferentcompositions
_version_ 1725176854224044032