Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study

Objectives: An understanding of bone mineral density (BMD) pattern in a population is crucial for prevention and diagnosis of osteoporosis and management of its complications in later life. This study aimed to screen the bone health status and factors associated with osteoporosis in an apparently he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neelam Kaushal, Divya Vohora, Rajinder K. Jalali, Sujeet Jha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-06-01
Series:Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525518300025
id doaj-191060557c4741149cb017d91ad5477a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-191060557c4741149cb017d91ad5477a2020-11-25T00:26:42ZengElsevierOsteoporosis and Sarcopenia2405-52552018-06-01425360Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective studyNeelam Kaushal0Divya Vohora1Rajinder K. Jalali2Sujeet Jha3Pharmaceutical Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, IndiaPharmaceutical Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India; Corresponding author. Pharmaceutical Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, Mehrauli-Badarpur Road, Near Batra Hospital, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi 110062, India.Medical Affairs & Clinical Research, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Gurgaon, IndiaInstitute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Max Healthcare Inst. Ltd., New Delhi, India; Corresponding author. Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Max Healthcare Inst. Ltd., Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017, India.Objectives: An understanding of bone mineral density (BMD) pattern in a population is crucial for prevention and diagnosis of osteoporosis and management of its complications in later life. This study aimed to screen the bone health status and factors associated with osteoporosis in an apparently healthy Indian population. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was done in a tertiary-care hospital for the subjects who had undergone preventive health-check-ups that included BMD measurements at femur-neck, total-femur, and lumbar-spine. Results: We evaluated 524 subjects (age, 50.0 ± 12.4 years) including 41.2% female and 58.8% male subjects. Osteoporosis was present in 6.9% subjects (female, 11.1%; male, 4.2%) and osteopenia in 34% subjects (female, 40.3%; male, 29.9%). Absolute BMD was higher in male subjects (P < 0.001) compared to female subjects at all bone sites. Prevalence of osteoporosis increased with age in female subjects, but not in male subjects. Osteoporosis rates in the age-groups of 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years were 3%, 3.4%, 14.3%, 18.6%, and 36.4%, respectively in female subjects while prevalence in male subjects was 0%, 4%, 6.5%, 4.3%, and 5.6%, respectively, at lumbar spine. Height (r = 0.234–0.358), weight (r = 0.305–0.388), body mass index (r = 0.143–0.285) and physical activity (r = 0.136–0.153) were positively; and alkaline phosphatase (r = −0.133 to −0.203) was negatively correlated with BMD (all P < 0.01) at all sites. These parameters retained significant correlation after controlling for age and sex. No correlation of serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D and calcium was noted with BMD (P > 0.05) at any site. Conclusions: Further data on absolute BMD, T scores, and prevalence rates of osteoporosis/osteopenia on multiple bone sites have been presented in this article. Keywords: Osteoporosis, Bone mineral density, Prevalence, T-scores, Osteopeniahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525518300025
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neelam Kaushal
Divya Vohora
Rajinder K. Jalali
Sujeet Jha
spellingShingle Neelam Kaushal
Divya Vohora
Rajinder K. Jalali
Sujeet Jha
Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
author_facet Neelam Kaushal
Divya Vohora
Rajinder K. Jalali
Sujeet Jha
author_sort Neelam Kaushal
title Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
title_short Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
title_full Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
title_fullStr Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
title_sort prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study
publisher Elsevier
series Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
issn 2405-5255
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Objectives: An understanding of bone mineral density (BMD) pattern in a population is crucial for prevention and diagnosis of osteoporosis and management of its complications in later life. This study aimed to screen the bone health status and factors associated with osteoporosis in an apparently healthy Indian population. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was done in a tertiary-care hospital for the subjects who had undergone preventive health-check-ups that included BMD measurements at femur-neck, total-femur, and lumbar-spine. Results: We evaluated 524 subjects (age, 50.0 ± 12.4 years) including 41.2% female and 58.8% male subjects. Osteoporosis was present in 6.9% subjects (female, 11.1%; male, 4.2%) and osteopenia in 34% subjects (female, 40.3%; male, 29.9%). Absolute BMD was higher in male subjects (P < 0.001) compared to female subjects at all bone sites. Prevalence of osteoporosis increased with age in female subjects, but not in male subjects. Osteoporosis rates in the age-groups of 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years were 3%, 3.4%, 14.3%, 18.6%, and 36.4%, respectively in female subjects while prevalence in male subjects was 0%, 4%, 6.5%, 4.3%, and 5.6%, respectively, at lumbar spine. Height (r = 0.234–0.358), weight (r = 0.305–0.388), body mass index (r = 0.143–0.285) and physical activity (r = 0.136–0.153) were positively; and alkaline phosphatase (r = −0.133 to −0.203) was negatively correlated with BMD (all P < 0.01) at all sites. These parameters retained significant correlation after controlling for age and sex. No correlation of serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D and calcium was noted with BMD (P > 0.05) at any site. Conclusions: Further data on absolute BMD, T scores, and prevalence rates of osteoporosis/osteopenia on multiple bone sites have been presented in this article. Keywords: Osteoporosis, Bone mineral density, Prevalence, T-scores, Osteopenia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525518300025
work_keys_str_mv AT neelamkaushal prevalenceofosteoporosisandosteopeniainanapparentlyhealthyindianpopulationacrosssectionalretrospectivestudy
AT divyavohora prevalenceofosteoporosisandosteopeniainanapparentlyhealthyindianpopulationacrosssectionalretrospectivestudy
AT rajinderkjalali prevalenceofosteoporosisandosteopeniainanapparentlyhealthyindianpopulationacrosssectionalretrospectivestudy
AT sujeetjha prevalenceofosteoporosisandosteopeniainanapparentlyhealthyindianpopulationacrosssectionalretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1725343158351429632