Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis

Purpose: To compare horizontal and vertical split conjunctival autograft technique in the management of double head pterygium. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 96 and 99 eyes with double head pterygia that underwent horizontal (Group 1) and vertical (Group 2) split conjunctival autografting, respe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor, B Soundarya, Ramamurthy Dandapani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=1;spage=66;epage=68;aulast=Kodavoor
id doaj-194b0e8200ba4a4b8ae5d21381113947
record_format Article
spelling doaj-194b0e8200ba4a4b8ae5d213811139472021-01-08T03:21:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892021-01-01691666810.4103/ijo.IJO_235_20Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysisShreesha Kumar KodavoorB SoundaryaRamamurthy DandapaniPurpose: To compare horizontal and vertical split conjunctival autograft technique in the management of double head pterygium. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 96 and 99 eyes with double head pterygia that underwent horizontal (Group 1) and vertical (Group 2) split conjunctival autografting, respectively. Comparison of recurrence rates and other complications was done. Results: Recurrence was seen in 5.2% and 4% of the eyes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P > 0.05). Other complications like subconjunctival hemorrhage, graft edema, graft retraction, granuloma, and graft loss were also comparable among the two groups. Conclusion: Both the techniques provide good results with comparable efficacy in terms of rates of recurrence and complication profiles.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=1;spage=66;epage=68;aulast=Kodavoorconjunctival autograftdouble head pterygiumsplit conjunctival autograft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor
B Soundarya
Ramamurthy Dandapani
spellingShingle Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor
B Soundarya
Ramamurthy Dandapani
Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
conjunctival autograft
double head pterygium
split conjunctival autograft
author_facet Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor
B Soundarya
Ramamurthy Dandapani
author_sort Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor
title Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis
title_short Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis
title_full Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: A retrospective analysis
title_sort comparison of horizontal versus vertical split conjunctival autograft in the management of double head pterygium: a retrospective analysis
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: To compare horizontal and vertical split conjunctival autograft technique in the management of double head pterygium. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 96 and 99 eyes with double head pterygia that underwent horizontal (Group 1) and vertical (Group 2) split conjunctival autografting, respectively. Comparison of recurrence rates and other complications was done. Results: Recurrence was seen in 5.2% and 4% of the eyes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P > 0.05). Other complications like subconjunctival hemorrhage, graft edema, graft retraction, granuloma, and graft loss were also comparable among the two groups. Conclusion: Both the techniques provide good results with comparable efficacy in terms of rates of recurrence and complication profiles.
topic conjunctival autograft
double head pterygium
split conjunctival autograft
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=1;spage=66;epage=68;aulast=Kodavoor
work_keys_str_mv AT shreeshakumarkodavoor comparisonofhorizontalversusverticalsplitconjunctivalautograftinthemanagementofdoubleheadpterygiumaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bsoundarya comparisonofhorizontalversusverticalsplitconjunctivalautograftinthemanagementofdoubleheadpterygiumaretrospectiveanalysis
AT ramamurthydandapani comparisonofhorizontalversusverticalsplitconjunctivalautograftinthemanagementofdoubleheadpterygiumaretrospectiveanalysis
_version_ 1724345311899418624