Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings

Empirical evidence shows that acting on early warnings can help humanitarian organizations reduce losses, damages and suffering while reducing costs. Available forecasts of extreme events can provide the information required to automatically trigger preparedness measures, while ‘value of information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Lopez, Erin Coughlan de Perez, Juan Bazo, Pablo Suarez, Bart van den Hurk, Marteen van Aalst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
Series:Weather and Climate Extremes
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094716300172
id doaj-19bb3877c3084c4f92dd1730f83943b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19bb3877c3084c4f92dd1730f83943b52020-11-25T02:03:41ZengElsevierWeather and Climate Extremes2212-09472020-03-0127Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warningsAna Lopez0Erin Coughlan de Perez1Juan Bazo2Pablo Suarez3Bart van den Hurk4Marteen van Aalst5University of Oxford, Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK; University College, Oxford, OX1 4BH, UK; Corresponding author. PO Box 28120, 2502 KC, The Hague, The Netherlands.Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands; Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, NY, USARed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands; Technological University of Peru (UTP), Lima, PeruRed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The NetherlandsInstitute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The NetherlandsRed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands; International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, NY, USAEmpirical evidence shows that acting on early warnings can help humanitarian organizations reduce losses, damages and suffering while reducing costs. Available forecasts of extreme events can provide the information required to automatically trigger preparedness measures, while ‘value of information’ approaches can, in principle, guide the selection of forecast thresholds that make early action preferable to inaction.We acknowledge here that, for real-world humanitarian situations, the value of information approach accurately estimates the value of forecasts only if key factors relevant for the humanitarian sector are taken into account. First, the negative consequences of acting in vain are significant and must be factored in. Secondly, the “most valuable” forecast thresholds depend on criteria beyond expenses reduction, and this choice must be explicitly considered in funding mechanisms for early warning products and services. Two options to guide this selection are examined: a maximizing criterion for cost effectiveness, and a satisficing criterion for loss avoidance. Third, decision-makers must be able to confidently assess whether the forecast threshold they are selecting is robust to all possible cost/loss structures for the action in question.Based on these considerations, we explore the application of the valuation approach to select which forecasts (magnitude, probability and lead time) should trigger humanitarian actions. Using a basic example of ensemble precipitation forecast to prepare for potential floods, we discuss how the valuation approach can be used to select probability thresholds that trigger early action, and some of the generalisations required to make this applicable to a wider range of humanitarian situations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094716300172
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Lopez
Erin Coughlan de Perez
Juan Bazo
Pablo Suarez
Bart van den Hurk
Marteen van Aalst
spellingShingle Ana Lopez
Erin Coughlan de Perez
Juan Bazo
Pablo Suarez
Bart van den Hurk
Marteen van Aalst
Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
Weather and Climate Extremes
author_facet Ana Lopez
Erin Coughlan de Perez
Juan Bazo
Pablo Suarez
Bart van den Hurk
Marteen van Aalst
author_sort Ana Lopez
title Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
title_short Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
title_full Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
title_fullStr Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
title_full_unstemmed Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
title_sort bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: a valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
publisher Elsevier
series Weather and Climate Extremes
issn 2212-0947
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Empirical evidence shows that acting on early warnings can help humanitarian organizations reduce losses, damages and suffering while reducing costs. Available forecasts of extreme events can provide the information required to automatically trigger preparedness measures, while ‘value of information’ approaches can, in principle, guide the selection of forecast thresholds that make early action preferable to inaction.We acknowledge here that, for real-world humanitarian situations, the value of information approach accurately estimates the value of forecasts only if key factors relevant for the humanitarian sector are taken into account. First, the negative consequences of acting in vain are significant and must be factored in. Secondly, the “most valuable” forecast thresholds depend on criteria beyond expenses reduction, and this choice must be explicitly considered in funding mechanisms for early warning products and services. Two options to guide this selection are examined: a maximizing criterion for cost effectiveness, and a satisficing criterion for loss avoidance. Third, decision-makers must be able to confidently assess whether the forecast threshold they are selecting is robust to all possible cost/loss structures for the action in question.Based on these considerations, we explore the application of the valuation approach to select which forecasts (magnitude, probability and lead time) should trigger humanitarian actions. Using a basic example of ensemble precipitation forecast to prepare for potential floods, we discuss how the valuation approach can be used to select probability thresholds that trigger early action, and some of the generalisations required to make this applicable to a wider range of humanitarian situations.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094716300172
work_keys_str_mv AT analopez bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings
AT erincoughlandeperez bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings
AT juanbazo bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings
AT pablosuarez bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings
AT bartvandenhurk bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings
AT marteenvanaalst bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings
_version_ 1724946397902405632