Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings
Empirical evidence shows that acting on early warnings can help humanitarian organizations reduce losses, damages and suffering while reducing costs. Available forecasts of extreme events can provide the information required to automatically trigger preparedness measures, while ‘value of information...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Weather and Climate Extremes |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094716300172 |
id |
doaj-19bb3877c3084c4f92dd1730f83943b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-19bb3877c3084c4f92dd1730f83943b52020-11-25T02:03:41ZengElsevierWeather and Climate Extremes2212-09472020-03-0127Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warningsAna Lopez0Erin Coughlan de Perez1Juan Bazo2Pablo Suarez3Bart van den Hurk4Marteen van Aalst5University of Oxford, Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK; University College, Oxford, OX1 4BH, UK; Corresponding author. PO Box 28120, 2502 KC, The Hague, The Netherlands.Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands; Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, NY, USARed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands; Technological University of Peru (UTP), Lima, PeruRed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The NetherlandsInstitute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The NetherlandsRed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands; International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, NY, USAEmpirical evidence shows that acting on early warnings can help humanitarian organizations reduce losses, damages and suffering while reducing costs. Available forecasts of extreme events can provide the information required to automatically trigger preparedness measures, while ‘value of information’ approaches can, in principle, guide the selection of forecast thresholds that make early action preferable to inaction.We acknowledge here that, for real-world humanitarian situations, the value of information approach accurately estimates the value of forecasts only if key factors relevant for the humanitarian sector are taken into account. First, the negative consequences of acting in vain are significant and must be factored in. Secondly, the “most valuable” forecast thresholds depend on criteria beyond expenses reduction, and this choice must be explicitly considered in funding mechanisms for early warning products and services. Two options to guide this selection are examined: a maximizing criterion for cost effectiveness, and a satisficing criterion for loss avoidance. Third, decision-makers must be able to confidently assess whether the forecast threshold they are selecting is robust to all possible cost/loss structures for the action in question.Based on these considerations, we explore the application of the valuation approach to select which forecasts (magnitude, probability and lead time) should trigger humanitarian actions. Using a basic example of ensemble precipitation forecast to prepare for potential floods, we discuss how the valuation approach can be used to select probability thresholds that trigger early action, and some of the generalisations required to make this applicable to a wider range of humanitarian situations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094716300172 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ana Lopez Erin Coughlan de Perez Juan Bazo Pablo Suarez Bart van den Hurk Marteen van Aalst |
spellingShingle |
Ana Lopez Erin Coughlan de Perez Juan Bazo Pablo Suarez Bart van den Hurk Marteen van Aalst Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings Weather and Climate Extremes |
author_facet |
Ana Lopez Erin Coughlan de Perez Juan Bazo Pablo Suarez Bart van den Hurk Marteen van Aalst |
author_sort |
Ana Lopez |
title |
Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings |
title_short |
Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings |
title_full |
Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings |
title_fullStr |
Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: A valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings |
title_sort |
bridging forecast verification and humanitarian decisions: a valuation approach for setting up action-oriented early warnings |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Weather and Climate Extremes |
issn |
2212-0947 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Empirical evidence shows that acting on early warnings can help humanitarian organizations reduce losses, damages and suffering while reducing costs. Available forecasts of extreme events can provide the information required to automatically trigger preparedness measures, while ‘value of information’ approaches can, in principle, guide the selection of forecast thresholds that make early action preferable to inaction.We acknowledge here that, for real-world humanitarian situations, the value of information approach accurately estimates the value of forecasts only if key factors relevant for the humanitarian sector are taken into account. First, the negative consequences of acting in vain are significant and must be factored in. Secondly, the “most valuable” forecast thresholds depend on criteria beyond expenses reduction, and this choice must be explicitly considered in funding mechanisms for early warning products and services. Two options to guide this selection are examined: a maximizing criterion for cost effectiveness, and a satisficing criterion for loss avoidance. Third, decision-makers must be able to confidently assess whether the forecast threshold they are selecting is robust to all possible cost/loss structures for the action in question.Based on these considerations, we explore the application of the valuation approach to select which forecasts (magnitude, probability and lead time) should trigger humanitarian actions. Using a basic example of ensemble precipitation forecast to prepare for potential floods, we discuss how the valuation approach can be used to select probability thresholds that trigger early action, and some of the generalisations required to make this applicable to a wider range of humanitarian situations. |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094716300172 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT analopez bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings AT erincoughlandeperez bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings AT juanbazo bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings AT pablosuarez bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings AT bartvandenhurk bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings AT marteenvanaalst bridgingforecastverificationandhumanitariandecisionsavaluationapproachforsettingupactionorientedearlywarnings |
_version_ |
1724946397902405632 |