Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used for neuropsychiatric disorders in clinical and research settings for almost 50 years now. Recent evidence demonstrates some efficacy in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depression in patients refractory to other treatment modalit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthis Synofzik, Thomas E. Schlaepfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2011-01-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X10000203
id doaj-19bc84a7f2e446ba94749a4c0366530c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19bc84a7f2e446ba94749a4c0366530c2021-03-18T04:34:49ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2011-01-0141716Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disordersMatthis Synofzik0Thomas E. Schlaepfer1Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany; Departments of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Correspondence: Thomas E. Schlaepfer, MD, Department of Psychiatry/University Hospital, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used for neuropsychiatric disorders in clinical and research settings for almost 50 years now. Recent evidence demonstrates some efficacy in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depression in patients refractory to other treatment modalities beyond single case reports. This has led to a considerable surge of clinical and commercial interest in DBS for psychiatric indications. Because of the high vulnerability of psychiatric patients, the lack of extensive short- and long-term data about effectiveness and the rapid spread of questionable indications this new field in psychiatry requires ethical criteria that can be applied to both research and clinical decision-making. Objective and Methods: We here present an evidence-based systematic ethical analysis of psychiatric DBS using the criteria of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy. Results and Conclusions: The proposed criteria are helpful in analyzing empirical evidence, informing research investigations and guiding clinical decision-making. This will prepare the ground for ethically justified, empirically comprehensive DBS in this highly vulnerable population and allow stringent future societal discussions about its legitimation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X10000203deep brain stimulationneuroethicsmajor depression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthis Synofzik
Thomas E. Schlaepfer
spellingShingle Matthis Synofzik
Thomas E. Schlaepfer
Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
Brain Stimulation
deep brain stimulation
neuroethics
major depression
author_facet Matthis Synofzik
Thomas E. Schlaepfer
author_sort Matthis Synofzik
title Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
title_short Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
title_full Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
title_fullStr Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
title_full_unstemmed Electrodes in the brain—Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
title_sort electrodes in the brain—ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used for neuropsychiatric disorders in clinical and research settings for almost 50 years now. Recent evidence demonstrates some efficacy in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depression in patients refractory to other treatment modalities beyond single case reports. This has led to a considerable surge of clinical and commercial interest in DBS for psychiatric indications. Because of the high vulnerability of psychiatric patients, the lack of extensive short- and long-term data about effectiveness and the rapid spread of questionable indications this new field in psychiatry requires ethical criteria that can be applied to both research and clinical decision-making. Objective and Methods: We here present an evidence-based systematic ethical analysis of psychiatric DBS using the criteria of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy. Results and Conclusions: The proposed criteria are helpful in analyzing empirical evidence, informing research investigations and guiding clinical decision-making. This will prepare the ground for ethically justified, empirically comprehensive DBS in this highly vulnerable population and allow stringent future societal discussions about its legitimation.
topic deep brain stimulation
neuroethics
major depression
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X10000203
work_keys_str_mv AT matthissynofzik electrodesinthebrainethicalcriteriaforresearchandtreatmentwithdeepbrainstimulationforneuropsychiatricdisorders
AT thomaseschlaepfer electrodesinthebrainethicalcriteriaforresearchandtreatmentwithdeepbrainstimulationforneuropsychiatricdisorders
_version_ 1724217472490405888