Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey

Fishing trials were carried out with gill nets and trammel nets in the northern Aegean Sea from March 2004 to February 2005. Four different mesh sizes for the gill nets and the inner panel of trammel nets (16, 18, 20 and 22 mm bar length) were used. Selectivity parameters for the five most economica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Saadet Karakulak, Hakan Erk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 2008-09-01
Series:Scientia Marina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1010
id doaj-19e6f05e5b0048c29ecc3e3209471490
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19e6f05e5b0048c29ecc3e32094714902021-05-05T13:49:41ZengConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasScientia Marina0214-83581886-81342008-09-0172352754010.3989/scimar.2008.72n35271000Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, TurkeyF. Saadet Karakulak0Hakan Erk1Faculty of Fisheries, Istanbul UniversityFaculty of Fisheries, Istanbul UniversityFishing trials were carried out with gill nets and trammel nets in the northern Aegean Sea from March 2004 to February 2005. Four different mesh sizes for the gill nets and the inner panel of trammel nets (16, 18, 20 and 22 mm bar length) were used. Selectivity parameters for the five most economically important species, bogue (Boops boops), annular sea bream (Diplodus annularis), striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus), axillary sea bream (Pagellus acarne) and blotched picarel (Spicara maena), caught by the two gears were estimated. The SELECT method was used to estimate the selectivity parameters of a variety of models. Catch composition and catch proportion of several species were different in gill and trammel nets. The length frequency distributions of the species caught by the two gears were significantly different. The bi-modal model selectivity curve gave the best fit for gill net and trammel net data, and there was little difference between the modal lengths of these nets. However, a clear difference was found in catching efficiency. The highest catch rates were obtained with the trammel net. Given that many discard species and small fish are caught by gill nets and trammel nets with a mesh size of 16 mm, it is clear that these nets are not appropriate for fisheries. Consequently, the best mesh size for multispecies fisheries is 18 mm. This mesh size will considerably reduce the numbers of small sized individuals and discard species in the catch.http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1010gill nettrammel netselectivityselect methodaegean seaturkey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Saadet Karakulak
Hakan Erk
spellingShingle F. Saadet Karakulak
Hakan Erk
Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey
Scientia Marina
gill net
trammel net
selectivity
select method
aegean sea
turkey
author_facet F. Saadet Karakulak
Hakan Erk
author_sort F. Saadet Karakulak
title Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey
title_short Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey
title_full Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey
title_fullStr Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey
title_sort gill net and trammel net selectivity in the northern aegean sea, turkey
publisher Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
series Scientia Marina
issn 0214-8358
1886-8134
publishDate 2008-09-01
description Fishing trials were carried out with gill nets and trammel nets in the northern Aegean Sea from March 2004 to February 2005. Four different mesh sizes for the gill nets and the inner panel of trammel nets (16, 18, 20 and 22 mm bar length) were used. Selectivity parameters for the five most economically important species, bogue (Boops boops), annular sea bream (Diplodus annularis), striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus), axillary sea bream (Pagellus acarne) and blotched picarel (Spicara maena), caught by the two gears were estimated. The SELECT method was used to estimate the selectivity parameters of a variety of models. Catch composition and catch proportion of several species were different in gill and trammel nets. The length frequency distributions of the species caught by the two gears were significantly different. The bi-modal model selectivity curve gave the best fit for gill net and trammel net data, and there was little difference between the modal lengths of these nets. However, a clear difference was found in catching efficiency. The highest catch rates were obtained with the trammel net. Given that many discard species and small fish are caught by gill nets and trammel nets with a mesh size of 16 mm, it is clear that these nets are not appropriate for fisheries. Consequently, the best mesh size for multispecies fisheries is 18 mm. This mesh size will considerably reduce the numbers of small sized individuals and discard species in the catch.
topic gill net
trammel net
selectivity
select method
aegean sea
turkey
url http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1010
work_keys_str_mv AT fsaadetkarakulak gillnetandtrammelnetselectivityinthenorthernaegeanseaturkey
AT hakanerk gillnetandtrammelnetselectivityinthenorthernaegeanseaturkey
_version_ 1721460915911524352