Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke
Always attuned to the dialectical relationship between literary productions and their sociohistorical contexts, the writings of Kenneth Burke refuse to essentialize literary discourse by making it a unique kind of language. This article maintains that Burke’s theory of literature and language as sym...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Литература двух Америк |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://litda.ru/images/2020-9/LDA-2020-9_60-80_Henderson.pdf |
id |
doaj-19e9083ac73d43b1a4bd3ec1bb9ee44d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-19e9083ac73d43b1a4bd3ec1bb9ee44d2021-02-27T06:24:46ZdeuRussian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World LiteratureЛитература двух Америк2541-78942542-243X2020-11-019608010.22455/2541-7894-2020-9-60-80Reading the Signs with Kenneth BurkeGreig Henderson 0University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaAlways attuned to the dialectical relationship between literary productions and their sociohistorical contexts, the writings of Kenneth Burke refuse to essentialize literary discourse by making it a unique kind of language. This article maintains that Burke’s theory of literature and language as symbolic action is capable of encompassing both these intrinsic and extrinsic aspects without being reducible to either of them. Dramatism is his name for the theory, and its strength derives from its recognition of the necessarily ambiguous transaction between the system of signs and the frame of reference. Nevertheless, there is an essentializing tendency in Burke’s thought. Logology, a perspective on language that achieves fruition in The Rhetoric of Religion (1961), is symptomatic of this tendency. I argue that there is a perceptible discontinuity between the dramatistic idea that literature and language are to be considered as symbolic action and the logological idea that words about God bear a strong resemblance to words about words. Logology— words about words—discovers in theology—words about God—the perfectionism implicit in all discourse. I conclude, however, that despite his flirtation with linguistic essentialism, Burke never loses sight of the fact that words are first and foremost agents of power, that they are value-laden, ideologically motivated, and morally and emotionally weighted instruments of persuasion, performance, representation and purpose. As a form of symbolic action in the world, literature is inextricably linked to society and history—it is not a privileged form of language that exists in its own separate and autonomous sphere.http://litda.ru/images/2020-9/LDA-2020-9_60-80_Henderson.pdfdramatismsituation/strategy designdream/prayer/chart triaddramatistic pentadgrammar/rhetoric/symbolic/the paradox of substanceterministic screenshierarchic psychosisentelechial motivelogology. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Greig Henderson |
spellingShingle |
Greig Henderson Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke Литература двух Америк dramatism situation/strategy design dream/prayer/chart triad dramatistic pentad grammar/rhetoric/symbolic/ the paradox of substance terministic screens hierarchic psychosis entelechial motive logology. |
author_facet |
Greig Henderson |
author_sort |
Greig Henderson |
title |
Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke |
title_short |
Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke |
title_full |
Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke |
title_fullStr |
Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke |
title_sort |
reading the signs with kenneth burke |
publisher |
Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
series |
Литература двух Америк |
issn |
2541-7894 2542-243X |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Always attuned to the dialectical relationship between literary productions and their sociohistorical contexts, the writings of Kenneth Burke refuse to essentialize literary discourse by making it a unique kind of language. This article maintains that Burke’s theory of literature and language as symbolic action is capable of encompassing both these intrinsic and extrinsic aspects without being reducible to either of them. Dramatism is his name for the theory, and its strength derives from its recognition of the necessarily ambiguous transaction between the system of signs and the frame of reference. Nevertheless, there is an essentializing tendency in Burke’s thought. Logology, a perspective on language that achieves fruition in The Rhetoric of Religion (1961), is symptomatic of this tendency. I argue that there is a perceptible discontinuity between the dramatistic idea that literature and language are to be considered as symbolic action and the logological idea that words about God bear a strong resemblance to words about words. Logology— words about words—discovers in theology—words about God—the perfectionism implicit in all discourse. I conclude, however, that despite his flirtation with linguistic essentialism, Burke never loses sight of the fact that words are first and foremost agents of power, that they are value-laden, ideologically motivated, and morally and emotionally weighted instruments of persuasion, performance, representation and purpose. As a form of symbolic action in the world, literature is inextricably linked to society and history—it is not a privileged form of language that exists in its own separate and autonomous sphere. |
topic |
dramatism situation/strategy design dream/prayer/chart triad dramatistic pentad grammar/rhetoric/symbolic/ the paradox of substance terministic screens hierarchic psychosis entelechial motive logology. |
url |
http://litda.ru/images/2020-9/LDA-2020-9_60-80_Henderson.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT greighenderson readingthesignswithkennethburke |
_version_ |
1724248014365655040 |