Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is expected to globally affect up to 80% of individuals at some point during their lifetime. While conventional LBP therapies are effective, they may result in adverse side-effects. It is thus common for patients to seek information about complementary and alternative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Y Ng, Kevin Gilotra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
Series:Integrative Medicine Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422020303292
id doaj-1a19459776924fd0b6cc2b34e267d4d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a19459776924fd0b6cc2b34e267d4d52021-10-09T04:37:50ZengElsevierIntegrative Medicine Research2213-42202021-09-01103100692Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessmentJeremy Y Ng0Kevin Gilotra1Corresponding author at: Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, Room 2112, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaBackground: Low back pain (LBP) is expected to globally affect up to 80% of individuals at some point during their lifetime. While conventional LBP therapies are effective, they may result in adverse side-effects. It is thus common for patients to seek information about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) online to either supplement or even replace their conventional LBP care. The present study sought to assess the quality of web-based consumer health information available at the intersection of LBP and CAM. Methods: We searched Google using six unique search terms across four English-speaking countries. Eligible websites contained consumer health information in the context of CAM for LBP. We used the DISCERN instrument, which consists of a standardized scoring system with a Likert scale from one to five across 16 questions, to conduct a quality assessment of websites. Results: Across 480 websites identified, 32 were deemed eligible and assessed using the DISCERN instrument. The mean overall rating across all websites 3.47 (SD = 0.70); Summed DISCERN scores across all websites ranged from 25.5-68.0, with a mean of 53.25 (SD = 10.41); the mean overall rating across all websites 3.47 (SD = 0.70). Most websites reported the benefits of numerous CAM treatment options and provided relevant information for the target audience clearly, but did not adequately report the risks or adverse side-effects adequately. Conclusion: Despite some high-quality resources identified, our findings highlight the varying quality of consumer health information available online at the intersection of LBP and CAM. Healthcare providers should be involved in the guidance of patients’ online information-seeking.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422020303292Low back painComplementary and alternative medicineQuality of informationConsumer health informationDISCERN
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeremy Y Ng
Kevin Gilotra
spellingShingle Jeremy Y Ng
Kevin Gilotra
Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
Integrative Medicine Research
Low back pain
Complementary and alternative medicine
Quality of information
Consumer health information
DISCERN
author_facet Jeremy Y Ng
Kevin Gilotra
author_sort Jeremy Y Ng
title Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
title_short Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
title_full Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
title_fullStr Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
title_full_unstemmed Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
title_sort web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment
publisher Elsevier
series Integrative Medicine Research
issn 2213-4220
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Background: Low back pain (LBP) is expected to globally affect up to 80% of individuals at some point during their lifetime. While conventional LBP therapies are effective, they may result in adverse side-effects. It is thus common for patients to seek information about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) online to either supplement or even replace their conventional LBP care. The present study sought to assess the quality of web-based consumer health information available at the intersection of LBP and CAM. Methods: We searched Google using six unique search terms across four English-speaking countries. Eligible websites contained consumer health information in the context of CAM for LBP. We used the DISCERN instrument, which consists of a standardized scoring system with a Likert scale from one to five across 16 questions, to conduct a quality assessment of websites. Results: Across 480 websites identified, 32 were deemed eligible and assessed using the DISCERN instrument. The mean overall rating across all websites 3.47 (SD = 0.70); Summed DISCERN scores across all websites ranged from 25.5-68.0, with a mean of 53.25 (SD = 10.41); the mean overall rating across all websites 3.47 (SD = 0.70). Most websites reported the benefits of numerous CAM treatment options and provided relevant information for the target audience clearly, but did not adequately report the risks or adverse side-effects adequately. Conclusion: Despite some high-quality resources identified, our findings highlight the varying quality of consumer health information available online at the intersection of LBP and CAM. Healthcare providers should be involved in the guidance of patients’ online information-seeking.
topic Low back pain
Complementary and alternative medicine
Quality of information
Consumer health information
DISCERN
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422020303292
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyyng webinformationsurroundingcomplementaryandalternativemedicineforlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurveyandqualityassessment
AT kevingilotra webinformationsurroundingcomplementaryandalternativemedicineforlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurveyandqualityassessment
_version_ 1716830659764289536