A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management

How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jens Emborg, Steven E. Daniels, Gregg B. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013/full
id doaj-1a2673e314bd44489b058c5294a51012
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a2673e314bd44489b058c5294a510122020-11-25T01:43:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2020-04-01510.3389/fcomm.2020.00013499350A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource ManagementJens Emborg0Steven E. Daniels1Gregg B. Walker2Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United StatesSchool of Communication and Media, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United StatesHow can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013/fulltrust buildingdistrust managementtrust judgmentstrustworthinessenvironmental conflictcollaboration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jens Emborg
Steven E. Daniels
Gregg B. Walker
spellingShingle Jens Emborg
Steven E. Daniels
Gregg B. Walker
A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
Frontiers in Communication
trust building
distrust management
trust judgments
trustworthiness
environmental conflict
collaboration
author_facet Jens Emborg
Steven E. Daniels
Gregg B. Walker
author_sort Jens Emborg
title A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
title_short A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
title_full A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
title_fullStr A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
title_full_unstemmed A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
title_sort framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Communication
issn 2297-900X
publishDate 2020-04-01
description How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice.
topic trust building
distrust management
trust judgments
trustworthiness
environmental conflict
collaboration
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jensemborg aframeworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT stevenedaniels aframeworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT greggbwalker aframeworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT jensemborg frameworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT stevenedaniels frameworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT greggbwalker frameworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement
_version_ 1725031026568200192