A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management
How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural r...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013/full |
id |
doaj-1a2673e314bd44489b058c5294a51012 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a2673e314bd44489b058c5294a510122020-11-25T01:43:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2020-04-01510.3389/fcomm.2020.00013499350A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource ManagementJens Emborg0Steven E. Daniels1Gregg B. Walker2Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United StatesSchool of Communication and Media, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United StatesHow can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013/fulltrust buildingdistrust managementtrust judgmentstrustworthinessenvironmental conflictcollaboration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jens Emborg Steven E. Daniels Gregg B. Walker |
spellingShingle |
Jens Emborg Steven E. Daniels Gregg B. Walker A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management Frontiers in Communication trust building distrust management trust judgments trustworthiness environmental conflict collaboration |
author_facet |
Jens Emborg Steven E. Daniels Gregg B. Walker |
author_sort |
Jens Emborg |
title |
A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management |
title_short |
A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management |
title_full |
A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management |
title_fullStr |
A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Framework for Exploring Trust and Distrust in Natural Resource Management |
title_sort |
framework for exploring trust and distrust in natural resource management |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Communication |
issn |
2297-900X |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
How can one simultaneously hold multiple trust judgments—some positive, some negative—and what relevance does this have to natural resource management processes? The paper examines trust through a lens of multiple simultaneous trust judgments, with application to the literature on trust in natural resource management. The conceptual contributions are (1) a clear distinction between trust and distrust, (2) how multiple trust/distrust judgments can co-exist, and (3) how multiple trust judgments can be assigned to individual vs. social/institutional scales. A framework for trust/distrust evaluation emerges in the form of a Trust/Distrust Matrix. One dimension of the matrix is the scales to which trust judgments may be assigned and one is the trust/distrust-judgments one makes that can either be calculus-based or identification-based. A set of propositions relevant to natural resource management are derived from the matrix. The fundamental purpose of this article is to bridge theory and practice. |
topic |
trust building distrust management trust judgments trustworthiness environmental conflict collaboration |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00013/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jensemborg aframeworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement AT stevenedaniels aframeworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement AT greggbwalker aframeworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement AT jensemborg frameworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement AT stevenedaniels frameworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement AT greggbwalker frameworkforexploringtrustanddistrustinnaturalresourcemanagement |
_version_ |
1725031026568200192 |