Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Early and rapid confirmation of dengue infections strengthens disease surveillance program and are critical to the success of vector control measures. Rapid diagnostics tests (RDTs) are increasingly used to confirm recent dengue infections due to their ease of use an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kok-Siang Yow, Joel Aik, Eugene Yong-Meng Tan, Lee-Ching Ng, Yee-Ling Lai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249602
id doaj-1a460384932440ed97afd826c0a63b21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a460384932440ed97afd826c0a63b212021-04-11T04:30:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01164e024960210.1371/journal.pone.0249602Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.Kok-Siang YowJoel AikEugene Yong-Meng TanLee-Ching NgYee-Ling Lai<h4>Introduction</h4>Early and rapid confirmation of dengue infections strengthens disease surveillance program and are critical to the success of vector control measures. Rapid diagnostics tests (RDTs) are increasingly used to confirm recent dengue infections due to their ease of use and short turnaround time for results. Several studies undertaken in dengue-endemic Southeast Asia have reported the performance of RDTs against enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and virus isolation methods. However, few studies have compared multiple RDTs for the detection of dengue NS1 antigen and IgM antibody in a single combo cassette. We evaluated six RDTs in Singapore for their utility in routine clinical testing to detect recent dengue infections.<h4>Methods</h4>The evaluation comprised two phases. The first phase sought to determine each RDT's specificity to dengue NS1 and IgM using zika and chikungunya virus supernatant and zika convalescent samples. RDTs that cross-reacted with zika or chikungunya were not further tested in phase 2. The second phase sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the remaining RDTs to dengue NS1 and IgM using pre-characterised dengue specimens and non-dengue/chikungunya febrile clinical specimens.<h4>Results</h4>None of the RDTs cross-reacted with zika IgM in Phase 1. Truquick and Quickprofile cross reacted with zika and chikungunya viruses and were not evaluated thereafter. Standard Q had the highest dengue NS1 and IgM sensitivity at 87.0% and 84.3% respectively whereas Bioline (68.5%) and Multisure (58.3%) had the lowest dengue NS1 and IgM sensitivity respectively. Combining dengue NS1/IgM detection results greatly improved the RDT ability to detect recent dengue infection; Standard Q had the highest sensitivity at 99.1% while Multisure had the lowest at 92.6%. All the RDTs were highly specific for dengue NS1 and IgM (96.7% to 100%). All the RDTs had high positive predictive values (98.4% to 100%) for NS1, IgM and combined NS1/IgM parameters whereas Standard Q had the highest negative predictive values at 68.2% (NS1), 63.8% (IgM) and 96.8% (NS1/IgM). For the RDTs, detection of NS1 declined from acute to convalescent phase of illness whereas IgM detection rate gradually increased over time.<h4>Conclusion</h4>In our study, several RDTs were evaluated for their diagnostic accuracy and capability in detecting recent dengue infection. Standard Q demonstrated a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and capability in the detection of NS1 and IgM biomarkers. RDTs can provide rapid and accurate confirmation of recent dengue infections and augment dengue surveillance and control programmes. Further studies are required to assess the usefulness of these RDTs in other epidemiology settings.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249602
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kok-Siang Yow
Joel Aik
Eugene Yong-Meng Tan
Lee-Ching Ng
Yee-Ling Lai
spellingShingle Kok-Siang Yow
Joel Aik
Eugene Yong-Meng Tan
Lee-Ching Ng
Yee-Ling Lai
Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kok-Siang Yow
Joel Aik
Eugene Yong-Meng Tan
Lee-Ching Ng
Yee-Ling Lai
author_sort Kok-Siang Yow
title Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
title_short Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
title_full Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
title_fullStr Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
title_full_unstemmed Rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: An evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
title_sort rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of recent dengue infections: an evaluation of six kits on clinical specimens.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Early and rapid confirmation of dengue infections strengthens disease surveillance program and are critical to the success of vector control measures. Rapid diagnostics tests (RDTs) are increasingly used to confirm recent dengue infections due to their ease of use and short turnaround time for results. Several studies undertaken in dengue-endemic Southeast Asia have reported the performance of RDTs against enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and virus isolation methods. However, few studies have compared multiple RDTs for the detection of dengue NS1 antigen and IgM antibody in a single combo cassette. We evaluated six RDTs in Singapore for their utility in routine clinical testing to detect recent dengue infections.<h4>Methods</h4>The evaluation comprised two phases. The first phase sought to determine each RDT's specificity to dengue NS1 and IgM using zika and chikungunya virus supernatant and zika convalescent samples. RDTs that cross-reacted with zika or chikungunya were not further tested in phase 2. The second phase sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the remaining RDTs to dengue NS1 and IgM using pre-characterised dengue specimens and non-dengue/chikungunya febrile clinical specimens.<h4>Results</h4>None of the RDTs cross-reacted with zika IgM in Phase 1. Truquick and Quickprofile cross reacted with zika and chikungunya viruses and were not evaluated thereafter. Standard Q had the highest dengue NS1 and IgM sensitivity at 87.0% and 84.3% respectively whereas Bioline (68.5%) and Multisure (58.3%) had the lowest dengue NS1 and IgM sensitivity respectively. Combining dengue NS1/IgM detection results greatly improved the RDT ability to detect recent dengue infection; Standard Q had the highest sensitivity at 99.1% while Multisure had the lowest at 92.6%. All the RDTs were highly specific for dengue NS1 and IgM (96.7% to 100%). All the RDTs had high positive predictive values (98.4% to 100%) for NS1, IgM and combined NS1/IgM parameters whereas Standard Q had the highest negative predictive values at 68.2% (NS1), 63.8% (IgM) and 96.8% (NS1/IgM). For the RDTs, detection of NS1 declined from acute to convalescent phase of illness whereas IgM detection rate gradually increased over time.<h4>Conclusion</h4>In our study, several RDTs were evaluated for their diagnostic accuracy and capability in detecting recent dengue infection. Standard Q demonstrated a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and capability in the detection of NS1 and IgM biomarkers. RDTs can provide rapid and accurate confirmation of recent dengue infections and augment dengue surveillance and control programmes. Further studies are required to assess the usefulness of these RDTs in other epidemiology settings.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249602
work_keys_str_mv AT koksiangyow rapiddiagnostictestsforthedetectionofrecentdengueinfectionsanevaluationofsixkitsonclinicalspecimens
AT joelaik rapiddiagnostictestsforthedetectionofrecentdengueinfectionsanevaluationofsixkitsonclinicalspecimens
AT eugeneyongmengtan rapiddiagnostictestsforthedetectionofrecentdengueinfectionsanevaluationofsixkitsonclinicalspecimens
AT leechingng rapiddiagnostictestsforthedetectionofrecentdengueinfectionsanevaluationofsixkitsonclinicalspecimens
AT yeelinglai rapiddiagnostictestsforthedetectionofrecentdengueinfectionsanevaluationofsixkitsonclinicalspecimens
_version_ 1714684327007092736