Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser.Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farzaneh Ahrari, Majid Akbari, Javad Akbari, Ghahraman Dabiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1077/385
id doaj-1a4c46ddf9484525b7161ef4ca332b25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a4c46ddf9484525b7161ef4ca332b252020-11-25T03:35:20ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-21852013-01-011018293Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up TechniquesFarzaneh AhrariMajid AkbariJavad AkbariGhahraman DabiriObjective: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser.Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third. The enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometry analysis and four parameters of surface irregularity (Ra, Rq, Rt and Rz) were recorded. Following bracket bonding and debonding, adhesive remnants were removed by tungsten carbide burs in low- or high- speed handpieces (group 1 and 2, respectively), an ultrafine diamond bur (group 3) or an Er:YAG laser (250 mJ, long pulse, 4 Hz) (group 4), and surface roughness parameters were measured again. Then, the buccal surfaces were polished and the third profilometry measurements were performed.Results: The specimens that were cleaned with a low speed tungsten carbide bur showed no significant difference in surface irregularity between the different treatment stages (p>0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly after clean-up with the diamond bur and the Er:YAG laser (p<0.01). In comparison between groups, adhesive removal with tungsten carbide burs at slow- or high-speed handpieces produced the lowest, while enamel clean-up with the Er:YAG laser caused the highest values of roughness measurements (P<0.05).Conclusion: Under the study conditions, application of the ultrafine diamond bur or the Er:YAG laser caused irreversible enamel damage on tooth surface, and thus these methods could not be recommended for removing adhesive remnants after debonding of orthodontic brackets.http://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1077/385LaserSolid-stateDental DebondingEnamelOrthodontics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farzaneh Ahrari
Majid Akbari
Javad Akbari
Ghahraman Dabiri
spellingShingle Farzaneh Ahrari
Majid Akbari
Javad Akbari
Ghahraman Dabiri
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Laser
Solid-state
Dental Debonding
Enamel
Orthodontics
author_facet Farzaneh Ahrari
Majid Akbari
Javad Akbari
Ghahraman Dabiri
author_sort Farzaneh Ahrari
title Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_short Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_full Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_fullStr Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
title_sort enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
issn 2008-2185
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Objective: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser.Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third. The enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometry analysis and four parameters of surface irregularity (Ra, Rq, Rt and Rz) were recorded. Following bracket bonding and debonding, adhesive remnants were removed by tungsten carbide burs in low- or high- speed handpieces (group 1 and 2, respectively), an ultrafine diamond bur (group 3) or an Er:YAG laser (250 mJ, long pulse, 4 Hz) (group 4), and surface roughness parameters were measured again. Then, the buccal surfaces were polished and the third profilometry measurements were performed.Results: The specimens that were cleaned with a low speed tungsten carbide bur showed no significant difference in surface irregularity between the different treatment stages (p>0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly after clean-up with the diamond bur and the Er:YAG laser (p<0.01). In comparison between groups, adhesive removal with tungsten carbide burs at slow- or high-speed handpieces produced the lowest, while enamel clean-up with the Er:YAG laser caused the highest values of roughness measurements (P<0.05).Conclusion: Under the study conditions, application of the ultrafine diamond bur or the Er:YAG laser caused irreversible enamel damage on tooth surface, and thus these methods could not be recommended for removing adhesive remnants after debonding of orthodontic brackets.
topic Laser
Solid-state
Dental Debonding
Enamel
Orthodontics
url http://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1077/385
work_keys_str_mv AT farzanehahrari enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
AT majidakbari enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
AT javadakbari enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
AT ghahramandabiri enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques
_version_ 1724555022072545280