Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser.Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third....
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1077/385 |
id |
doaj-1a4c46ddf9484525b7161ef4ca332b25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a4c46ddf9484525b7161ef4ca332b252020-11-25T03:35:20ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-21852013-01-011018293Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up TechniquesFarzaneh AhrariMajid AkbariJavad AkbariGhahraman DabiriObjective: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser.Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third. The enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometry analysis and four parameters of surface irregularity (Ra, Rq, Rt and Rz) were recorded. Following bracket bonding and debonding, adhesive remnants were removed by tungsten carbide burs in low- or high- speed handpieces (group 1 and 2, respectively), an ultrafine diamond bur (group 3) or an Er:YAG laser (250 mJ, long pulse, 4 Hz) (group 4), and surface roughness parameters were measured again. Then, the buccal surfaces were polished and the third profilometry measurements were performed.Results: The specimens that were cleaned with a low speed tungsten carbide bur showed no significant difference in surface irregularity between the different treatment stages (p>0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly after clean-up with the diamond bur and the Er:YAG laser (p<0.01). In comparison between groups, adhesive removal with tungsten carbide burs at slow- or high-speed handpieces produced the lowest, while enamel clean-up with the Er:YAG laser caused the highest values of roughness measurements (P<0.05).Conclusion: Under the study conditions, application of the ultrafine diamond bur or the Er:YAG laser caused irreversible enamel damage on tooth surface, and thus these methods could not be recommended for removing adhesive remnants after debonding of orthodontic brackets.http://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1077/385LaserSolid-stateDental DebondingEnamelOrthodontics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Farzaneh Ahrari Majid Akbari Javad Akbari Ghahraman Dabiri |
spellingShingle |
Farzaneh Ahrari Majid Akbari Javad Akbari Ghahraman Dabiri Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Laser Solid-state Dental Debonding Enamel Orthodontics |
author_facet |
Farzaneh Ahrari Majid Akbari Javad Akbari Ghahraman Dabiri |
author_sort |
Farzaneh Ahrari |
title |
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques |
title_short |
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques |
title_full |
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques |
title_fullStr |
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques |
title_sort |
enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
issn |
2008-2185 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate enamel roughness after adhesive removal using different burs and an Er:YAG laser.Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of forty human premolars were sealed by two layers of nail varnish, except for a circular area of 3 mm in diameter on the middle third. The enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometry analysis and four parameters of surface irregularity (Ra, Rq, Rt and Rz) were recorded. Following bracket bonding and debonding, adhesive remnants were removed by tungsten carbide burs in low- or high- speed handpieces (group 1 and 2, respectively), an ultrafine diamond bur (group 3) or an Er:YAG laser (250 mJ, long pulse, 4 Hz) (group 4), and surface roughness parameters were measured again. Then, the buccal surfaces were polished and the third profilometry measurements were performed.Results: The specimens that were cleaned with a low speed tungsten carbide bur showed no significant difference in surface irregularity between the different treatment stages (p>0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly after clean-up with the diamond bur and the Er:YAG laser (p<0.01). In comparison between groups, adhesive removal with tungsten carbide burs at slow- or high-speed handpieces produced the lowest, while enamel clean-up with the Er:YAG laser caused the highest values of roughness measurements (P<0.05).Conclusion: Under the study conditions, application of the ultrafine diamond bur or the Er:YAG laser caused irreversible enamel damage on tooth surface, and thus these methods could not be recommended for removing adhesive remnants after debonding of orthodontic brackets. |
topic |
Laser Solid-state Dental Debonding Enamel Orthodontics |
url |
http://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1077/385 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT farzanehahrari enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques AT majidakbari enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques AT javadakbari enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques AT ghahramandabiri enamelsurfaceroughnessafterdebondingoforthodonticbracketsandvariouscleanuptechniques |
_version_ |
1724555022072545280 |