Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties

Irish and international legal reform resulting from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD] has primarily focussed on Article 12, the right to exercise legal capacity. Article 13, which declares the right to access justice and the right to access procedural accommodations fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine O'Leary, Michael Feely
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Ohio State University Libraries 2018-02-01
Series:Disability Studies Quarterly
Online Access:http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5587
id doaj-1a5c20d0cfa64561b743229131eb1f8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a5c20d0cfa64561b743229131eb1f8e2020-11-24T22:22:28ZengThe Ohio State University LibrariesDisability Studies Quarterly1041-57182159-83712018-02-0138110.18061/dsq.v38i1.55873981Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficultiesCatherine O'Leary0Michael Feely1Trinity College DublinTrinity College DublinIrish and international legal reform resulting from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD] has primarily focussed on Article 12, the right to exercise legal capacity. Article 13, which declares the right to access justice and the right to access procedural accommodations for all with disabilities, is often neglected. Specifically, research has not sufficiently explored the accommodations needed by witnesses with communication difficulties to testify in the courtroom. This study brings this aspect of Article 13 into focus by exploring the views of Irish legal professionals and disability advocates regarding existing and potential further accommodations for witnesses with communication diffiuclties in Irish criminal proceedings. By comparing and contrasting contributions, a series of conflicting perspectives between the legal profession and disability community are revealed. As successful implementation of Article 13 requires collaboration between both groups, this study concludes that these conflicts will need to be acknowledged and addressed in order for reform of courtroom accommodations to succeed.http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5587
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catherine O'Leary
Michael Feely
spellingShingle Catherine O'Leary
Michael Feely
Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties
Disability Studies Quarterly
author_facet Catherine O'Leary
Michael Feely
author_sort Catherine O'Leary
title Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties
title_short Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties
title_full Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties
title_fullStr Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties
title_full_unstemmed Alignment of the Irish legal system and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for witnesses with communication difficulties
title_sort alignment of the irish legal system and article 13.1 of the crpd for witnesses with communication difficulties
publisher The Ohio State University Libraries
series Disability Studies Quarterly
issn 1041-5718
2159-8371
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Irish and international legal reform resulting from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD] has primarily focussed on Article 12, the right to exercise legal capacity. Article 13, which declares the right to access justice and the right to access procedural accommodations for all with disabilities, is often neglected. Specifically, research has not sufficiently explored the accommodations needed by witnesses with communication difficulties to testify in the courtroom. This study brings this aspect of Article 13 into focus by exploring the views of Irish legal professionals and disability advocates regarding existing and potential further accommodations for witnesses with communication diffiuclties in Irish criminal proceedings. By comparing and contrasting contributions, a series of conflicting perspectives between the legal profession and disability community are revealed. As successful implementation of Article 13 requires collaboration between both groups, this study concludes that these conflicts will need to be acknowledged and addressed in order for reform of courtroom accommodations to succeed.
url http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5587
work_keys_str_mv AT catherineoleary alignmentoftheirishlegalsystemandarticle131ofthecrpdforwitnesseswithcommunicationdifficulties
AT michaelfeely alignmentoftheirishlegalsystemandarticle131ofthecrpdforwitnesseswithcommunicationdifficulties
_version_ 1725768140779945984