Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study

BackgroundAlthough many anti-diabetic drugs have been used to control hyperglycemia for decades, the efficacy of commonly-used oral glucose-lowering agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated.MethodsWe evaluated the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitaz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kun Ho Yoon, Jeong Ah Shin, Hyuk Sang Kwon, Seung Hwan Lee, Kyung Wan Min, Yu Bae Ahn, Soon Jib Yoo, Kyu Jeung Ahn, Sung Woo Park, Kwan Woo Lee, Yeon Ah Sung, Tae Sun Park, Min Seon Kim, Yong Ki Kim, Moon Suk Nam, Hye Soon Kim, Ie Byung Park, Jong Suk Park, Jeong Taek Woo, Ho Young Son
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Diabetes Association 2011-02-01
Series:Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-35-26.pdf
id doaj-1a5ce222e9564376917ae1df8f5d44f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a5ce222e9564376917ae1df8f5d44f02020-11-24T23:37:53ZengKorean Diabetes AssociationDiabetes & Metabolism Journal2233-60792233-60872011-02-01351263310.4093/dmj.2011.35.1.262743Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy StudyKun Ho YoonJeong Ah ShinHyuk Sang KwonSeung Hwan LeeKyung Wan MinYu Bae AhnSoon Jib YooKyu Jeung AhnSung Woo ParkKwan Woo LeeYeon Ah SungTae Sun ParkMin Seon KimYong Ki KimMoon Suk NamHye Soon KimIe Byung ParkJong Suk ParkJeong Taek WooHo Young SonBackgroundAlthough many anti-diabetic drugs have been used to control hyperglycemia for decades, the efficacy of commonly-used oral glucose-lowering agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated.MethodsWe evaluated the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as initial treatment for drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a 48-week, double-blind, randomized controlled study that included 349 Korean patients. Our primary goal was to determine the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to end point. Our secondary goal was to evaluate changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, body weight, frequency of adverse events, and the proportion of participants achieving target HbA1c levels.ResultsHbA1c levels decreased from 7.8% to 6.9% in the glimepiride group (P<0.001), from 7.9% to 7.0% in the metformin group (P<0.001), and from 7.8% to 7.0% (P<0.001) in the rosiglitazone group. Glimepiride and rosiglitazone significantly increased body weight and metformin reduced body weight during the study period. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was more frequent in the glimepiride group and diarrhea was more frequent in the metformin group.ConclusionThe efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as antidiabetic monotherapies in drug-naïve Korean type 2 diabetic patients was similar in the three groups, with no statistical difference. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of commonly-used oral hypoglycemic agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. An additional subgroup analysis is recommended to obtain more detailed information.http://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-35-26.pdfDiabetes mellitus, type 2GlimepirideMetforminRosiglitazone
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kun Ho Yoon
Jeong Ah Shin
Hyuk Sang Kwon
Seung Hwan Lee
Kyung Wan Min
Yu Bae Ahn
Soon Jib Yoo
Kyu Jeung Ahn
Sung Woo Park
Kwan Woo Lee
Yeon Ah Sung
Tae Sun Park
Min Seon Kim
Yong Ki Kim
Moon Suk Nam
Hye Soon Kim
Ie Byung Park
Jong Suk Park
Jeong Taek Woo
Ho Young Son
spellingShingle Kun Ho Yoon
Jeong Ah Shin
Hyuk Sang Kwon
Seung Hwan Lee
Kyung Wan Min
Yu Bae Ahn
Soon Jib Yoo
Kyu Jeung Ahn
Sung Woo Park
Kwan Woo Lee
Yeon Ah Sung
Tae Sun Park
Min Seon Kim
Yong Ki Kim
Moon Suk Nam
Hye Soon Kim
Ie Byung Park
Jong Suk Park
Jeong Taek Woo
Ho Young Son
Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Diabetes mellitus, type 2
Glimepiride
Metformin
Rosiglitazone
author_facet Kun Ho Yoon
Jeong Ah Shin
Hyuk Sang Kwon
Seung Hwan Lee
Kyung Wan Min
Yu Bae Ahn
Soon Jib Yoo
Kyu Jeung Ahn
Sung Woo Park
Kwan Woo Lee
Yeon Ah Sung
Tae Sun Park
Min Seon Kim
Yong Ki Kim
Moon Suk Nam
Hye Soon Kim
Ie Byung Park
Jong Suk Park
Jeong Taek Woo
Ho Young Son
author_sort Kun Ho Yoon
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone monotherapy in korean drug-naïve type 2 diabetic patients: the practical evidence of antidiabetic monotherapy study
publisher Korean Diabetes Association
series Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
issn 2233-6079
2233-6087
publishDate 2011-02-01
description BackgroundAlthough many anti-diabetic drugs have been used to control hyperglycemia for decades, the efficacy of commonly-used oral glucose-lowering agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated.MethodsWe evaluated the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as initial treatment for drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a 48-week, double-blind, randomized controlled study that included 349 Korean patients. Our primary goal was to determine the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to end point. Our secondary goal was to evaluate changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, body weight, frequency of adverse events, and the proportion of participants achieving target HbA1c levels.ResultsHbA1c levels decreased from 7.8% to 6.9% in the glimepiride group (P<0.001), from 7.9% to 7.0% in the metformin group (P<0.001), and from 7.8% to 7.0% (P<0.001) in the rosiglitazone group. Glimepiride and rosiglitazone significantly increased body weight and metformin reduced body weight during the study period. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was more frequent in the glimepiride group and diarrhea was more frequent in the metformin group.ConclusionThe efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as antidiabetic monotherapies in drug-naïve Korean type 2 diabetic patients was similar in the three groups, with no statistical difference. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of commonly-used oral hypoglycemic agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. An additional subgroup analysis is recommended to obtain more detailed information.
topic Diabetes mellitus, type 2
Glimepiride
Metformin
Rosiglitazone
url http://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-35-26.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kunhoyoon comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT jeongahshin comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT hyuksangkwon comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT seunghwanlee comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT kyungwanmin comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT yubaeahn comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT soonjibyoo comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT kyujeungahn comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT sungwoopark comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT kwanwoolee comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT yeonahsung comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT taesunpark comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT minseonkim comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT yongkikim comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT moonsuknam comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT hyesoonkim comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT iebyungpark comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT jongsukpark comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT jeongtaekwoo comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
AT hoyoungson comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy
_version_ 1725518509341933568