EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
Child peer interaction in English as a foreign language (EFL) settings has recently received increasing attention with respect to age, instruction type and first language (L1) use, but longitudinal studies remain scarce and the effects of proficiency pairing and language choice on meaning negotiatio...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/24679 |
id |
doaj-1aa4516a171a4b53b48c1edab11b7096 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1aa4516a171a4b53b48c1edab11b70962020-11-25T03:52:15ZengDepartment of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz UniversityStudies in Second Language Learning and Teaching2083-52052084-19652020-09-01103449472 EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 0Alexandra Vraciu 1Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Universitat de Lleida Child peer interaction in English as a foreign language (EFL) settings has recently received increasing attention with respect to age, instruction type and first language (L1) use, but longitudinal studies remain scarce and the effects of proficiency pairing and language choice on meaning negotiation strategies are still rather unexplored. Within a primary school EFL context, this paper aims to explore the amount and types of meaning negotiation, and the effects of time, proficiency pairing and language choice in a spot-the-differences task. Forty Catalan/Spanish bilingual children were paired into mixed and matched proficiency dyads, and their oral production was analyzed twice over the course of two years (i.e., 9-10 and 11-12 years old). The analysis included conversational adjustments, self- and other-repetition and positive and negative feedback in the learners’ L1 and second language (L2). Our data show that the amount of meaning negotiation is low, although L2 meaning negotiation is higher than L1 meaning negotiation, and all the strategies are present in the data except for comprehension checks. Time effects are hardly observed. However, proficiency pairing and language effects are more generally found, whereby mixed proficiency dyads tend to negotiate for meaning more than matched dyads and meaning negotiation instances are more frequent in the L2 than in the L1.https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/24679efl child peer interactiontimeproficiency pairinglanguage |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester Alexandra Vraciu |
spellingShingle |
Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester Alexandra Vraciu EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching efl child peer interaction time proficiency pairing language |
author_facet |
Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester Alexandra Vraciu |
author_sort |
Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester |
title |
EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction |
title_short |
EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction |
title_full |
EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction |
title_fullStr |
EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction |
title_sort |
efl child peer interaction: measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction |
publisher |
Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University |
series |
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching |
issn |
2083-5205 2084-1965 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Child peer interaction in English as a foreign language (EFL) settings has recently received increasing attention with respect to age, instruction type and first language (L1) use, but longitudinal studies remain scarce and the effects of proficiency pairing and language choice on meaning negotiation strategies are still rather unexplored. Within a primary school EFL context, this paper aims to explore the amount and types of meaning negotiation, and the effects of time, proficiency pairing and language choice in a spot-the-differences task. Forty Catalan/Spanish bilingual children were paired into mixed and matched proficiency dyads, and their oral production was analyzed twice over the course of two years (i.e., 9-10 and 11-12 years old). The analysis included conversational adjustments, self- and other-repetition and positive and negative feedback in the learners’ L1 and second language (L2). Our data show that the amount of meaning negotiation is low, although L2 meaning negotiation is higher than L1 meaning negotiation, and all the strategies are present in the data except for comprehension checks. Time effects are hardly observed. However, proficiency pairing and language effects are more generally found, whereby mixed proficiency dyads tend to negotiate for meaning more than matched dyads and meaning negotiation instances are more frequent in the L2 than in the L1. |
topic |
efl child peer interaction time proficiency pairing language |
url |
https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/24679 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elisabetpladevallballester eflchildpeerinteractionmeasuringtheeffectoftimeproficiencypairingandlanguageofinteraction AT alexandravraciu eflchildpeerinteractionmeasuringtheeffectoftimeproficiencypairingandlanguageofinteraction |
_version_ |
1724483463643398144 |