EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction

Child peer interaction in English as a foreign language (EFL) settings has recently received increasing attention with respect to age, instruction type and first language (L1) use, but longitudinal studies remain scarce and the effects of proficiency pairing and language choice on meaning negotiatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester, Alexandra Vraciu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University 2020-09-01
Series:Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/24679
id doaj-1aa4516a171a4b53b48c1edab11b7096
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1aa4516a171a4b53b48c1edab11b70962020-11-25T03:52:15ZengDepartment of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz UniversityStudies in Second Language Learning and Teaching2083-52052084-19652020-09-01103449472 EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 0Alexandra Vraciu 1Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Universitat de Lleida Child peer interaction in English as a foreign language (EFL) settings has recently received increasing attention with respect to age, instruction type and first language (L1) use, but longitudinal studies remain scarce and the effects of proficiency pairing and language choice on meaning negotiation strategies are still rather unexplored. Within a primary school EFL context, this paper aims to explore the amount and types of meaning negotiation, and the effects of time, proficiency pairing and language choice in a spot-the-differences task. Forty Catalan/Spanish bilingual children were paired into mixed and matched proficiency dyads, and their oral production was analyzed twice over the course of two years (i.e., 9-10 and 11-12 years old). The analysis included conversational adjustments, self- and other-repetition and positive and negative feedback in the learners’ L1 and second language (L2). Our data show that the amount of meaning negotiation is low, although L2 meaning negotiation is higher than L1 meaning negotiation, and all the strategies are present in the data except for comprehension checks. Time effects are hardly observed. However, proficiency pairing and language effects are more generally found, whereby mixed proficiency dyads tend to negotiate for meaning more than matched dyads and meaning negotiation instances are more frequent in the L2 than in the L1.https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/24679efl child peer interactiontimeproficiency pairinglanguage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester
Alexandra Vraciu
spellingShingle Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester
Alexandra Vraciu
EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
efl child peer interaction
time
proficiency pairing
language
author_facet Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester
Alexandra Vraciu
author_sort Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester
title EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
title_short EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
title_full EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
title_fullStr EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
title_full_unstemmed EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
title_sort efl child peer interaction: measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction
publisher Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University
series Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
issn 2083-5205
2084-1965
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Child peer interaction in English as a foreign language (EFL) settings has recently received increasing attention with respect to age, instruction type and first language (L1) use, but longitudinal studies remain scarce and the effects of proficiency pairing and language choice on meaning negotiation strategies are still rather unexplored. Within a primary school EFL context, this paper aims to explore the amount and types of meaning negotiation, and the effects of time, proficiency pairing and language choice in a spot-the-differences task. Forty Catalan/Spanish bilingual children were paired into mixed and matched proficiency dyads, and their oral production was analyzed twice over the course of two years (i.e., 9-10 and 11-12 years old). The analysis included conversational adjustments, self- and other-repetition and positive and negative feedback in the learners’ L1 and second language (L2). Our data show that the amount of meaning negotiation is low, although L2 meaning negotiation is higher than L1 meaning negotiation, and all the strategies are present in the data except for comprehension checks. Time effects are hardly observed. However, proficiency pairing and language effects are more generally found, whereby mixed proficiency dyads tend to negotiate for meaning more than matched dyads and meaning negotiation instances are more frequent in the L2 than in the L1.
topic efl child peer interaction
time
proficiency pairing
language
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/24679
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabetpladevallballester eflchildpeerinteractionmeasuringtheeffectoftimeproficiencypairingandlanguageofinteraction
AT alexandravraciu eflchildpeerinteractionmeasuringtheeffectoftimeproficiencypairingandlanguageofinteraction
_version_ 1724483463643398144