Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for non-maturing native arteriovenous fistulas according to the approach route (arterial vs. venous). Methods Eighty-five patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for non-maturing fistulas (63 radioce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sang Min Lee, Jae Boem Na, Ho Cheol Choi, Jung Ho Won, Ji Eun Kim, Ji Hoon Shin, Hyun Oh Park, Sung Eun Park, Raffaele Serra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523969/?tool=EBI
id doaj-1ab120f8e54f4deabc17181ff0d9eeaa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ab120f8e54f4deabc17181ff0d9eeaa2020-11-25T03:58:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?Sang Min LeeJae Boem NaHo Cheol ChoiJung Ho WonJi Eun KimJi Hoon ShinHyun Oh ParkSung Eun ParkRaffaele SerraObjectives To evaluate the efficacy and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for non-maturing native arteriovenous fistulas according to the approach route (arterial vs. venous). Methods Eighty-five patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for non-maturing fistulas (63 radiocephalic and 22 brachiocephalic) between 2010 and 2019. Outcome variables such as procedural success, complications, and primary and secondary patency rates were analyzed from the patients’ demographic, angiographic, clinical, and hemodialysis records according to the approach route (venous access group, n = 53 and arterial access group, n = 32). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the patency rates. Results The mean duration from fistula creation to fistulography was 78.4±51.4 days (range, 1–180 days). The anatomical and clinical success rates were 98.8% and 83.5%, respectively. Lesions were most commonly located at the juxta-anastomosis (55.3%). Accessory cephalic veins were observed in 16 patients. The primary patency rates were 83.9%, 71.9%, and 66.3% and the secondary patency rates were 98.6%, 95.9%, and 94.2% at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. The degree of hypertension (P = 0.023), minimal preoperative vein size (P = 0.041), and increment in postoperative vein diameter were higher in the venous access group than in the arterial access group (P<0.01). The frequency of using cutting balloons (P = 0.026) and complication rate were higher in the arterial access group than in the venous access group (arterial access: 1 major, 8 minor; venous access: 4 minor; P = 0.015). Conclusions Aggressive evaluation and endovascular therapy can salvage most non-maturing fistulas. Transradial and distal radial approaches can be effective even for challenging lesions.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523969/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sang Min Lee
Jae Boem Na
Ho Cheol Choi
Jung Ho Won
Ji Eun Kim
Ji Hoon Shin
Hyun Oh Park
Sung Eun Park
Raffaele Serra
spellingShingle Sang Min Lee
Jae Boem Na
Ho Cheol Choi
Jung Ho Won
Ji Eun Kim
Ji Hoon Shin
Hyun Oh Park
Sung Eun Park
Raffaele Serra
Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sang Min Lee
Jae Boem Na
Ho Cheol Choi
Jung Ho Won
Ji Eun Kim
Ji Hoon Shin
Hyun Oh Park
Sung Eun Park
Raffaele Serra
author_sort Sang Min Lee
title Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
title_short Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
title_full Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
title_fullStr Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: Which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
title_sort percutaneous intervention for salvage of non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: which is the better approach, arterial or venous?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and long-term patency of endovascular treatment for non-maturing native arteriovenous fistulas according to the approach route (arterial vs. venous). Methods Eighty-five patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for non-maturing fistulas (63 radiocephalic and 22 brachiocephalic) between 2010 and 2019. Outcome variables such as procedural success, complications, and primary and secondary patency rates were analyzed from the patients’ demographic, angiographic, clinical, and hemodialysis records according to the approach route (venous access group, n = 53 and arterial access group, n = 32). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the patency rates. Results The mean duration from fistula creation to fistulography was 78.4±51.4 days (range, 1–180 days). The anatomical and clinical success rates were 98.8% and 83.5%, respectively. Lesions were most commonly located at the juxta-anastomosis (55.3%). Accessory cephalic veins were observed in 16 patients. The primary patency rates were 83.9%, 71.9%, and 66.3% and the secondary patency rates were 98.6%, 95.9%, and 94.2% at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. The degree of hypertension (P = 0.023), minimal preoperative vein size (P = 0.041), and increment in postoperative vein diameter were higher in the venous access group than in the arterial access group (P<0.01). The frequency of using cutting balloons (P = 0.026) and complication rate were higher in the arterial access group than in the venous access group (arterial access: 1 major, 8 minor; venous access: 4 minor; P = 0.015). Conclusions Aggressive evaluation and endovascular therapy can salvage most non-maturing fistulas. Transradial and distal radial approaches can be effective even for challenging lesions.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523969/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT sangminlee percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT jaeboemna percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT hocheolchoi percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT junghowon percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT jieunkim percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT jihoonshin percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT hyunohpark percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT sungeunpark percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
AT raffaeleserra percutaneousinterventionforsalvageofnonmaturingarteriovenousfistulaswhichisthebetterapproacharterialorvenous
_version_ 1724457073255645184