The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion

In the generative tradition, the language faculty has been shrinking—perhaps to include only the mechanism of recursion. This paper argues that even this view of the language faculty is too expansive. We first argue that a language faculty is difficult to reconcile with evolutionary considerations....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morten H Christiansen, Nick eChater
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182/full
id doaj-1ab22d2f9b4343308c09c1761c0f68b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ab22d2f9b4343308c09c1761c0f68b32020-11-24T23:30:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-08-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182150920The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language RecursionMorten H Christiansen0Morten H Christiansen1Morten H Christiansen2Nick eChater3Cornell UniversityUniversity of Southern DenmarkHaskins LaboratoriesUniversity of WarwickIn the generative tradition, the language faculty has been shrinking—perhaps to include only the mechanism of recursion. This paper argues that even this view of the language faculty is too expansive. We first argue that a language faculty is difficult to reconcile with evolutionary considerations. We then focus on recursion as a detailed case study, arguing that our ability to process recursive structure does not rely on recursion as a property of the grammar, but instead emerge gradually by piggybacking on domain-general sequence learning abilities. Evidence from genetics, comparative work on non-human primates, and cognitive neuroscience suggests that humans have evolved complex sequence learning skills, which were subsequently pressed into service to accommodate language. Constraints on sequence learning therefore have played an important role in shaping the cultural evolution of linguistic structure, including our limited abilities for processing recursive structure. Finally, we re-evaluate some of the key considerations that have often been taken to require the postulation of a language faculty.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182/fullCultural Evolutionsequence learninglanguage evolutionrecursiondomain-general processesLanguage faculty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morten H Christiansen
Morten H Christiansen
Morten H Christiansen
Nick eChater
spellingShingle Morten H Christiansen
Morten H Christiansen
Morten H Christiansen
Nick eChater
The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion
Frontiers in Psychology
Cultural Evolution
sequence learning
language evolution
recursion
domain-general processes
Language faculty
author_facet Morten H Christiansen
Morten H Christiansen
Morten H Christiansen
Nick eChater
author_sort Morten H Christiansen
title The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion
title_short The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion
title_full The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion
title_fullStr The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion
title_full_unstemmed The Language Faculty that Wasn't: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion
title_sort language faculty that wasn't: a usage-based account of natural language recursion
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-08-01
description In the generative tradition, the language faculty has been shrinking—perhaps to include only the mechanism of recursion. This paper argues that even this view of the language faculty is too expansive. We first argue that a language faculty is difficult to reconcile with evolutionary considerations. We then focus on recursion as a detailed case study, arguing that our ability to process recursive structure does not rely on recursion as a property of the grammar, but instead emerge gradually by piggybacking on domain-general sequence learning abilities. Evidence from genetics, comparative work on non-human primates, and cognitive neuroscience suggests that humans have evolved complex sequence learning skills, which were subsequently pressed into service to accommodate language. Constraints on sequence learning therefore have played an important role in shaping the cultural evolution of linguistic structure, including our limited abilities for processing recursive structure. Finally, we re-evaluate some of the key considerations that have often been taken to require the postulation of a language faculty.
topic Cultural Evolution
sequence learning
language evolution
recursion
domain-general processes
Language faculty
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mortenhchristiansen thelanguagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT mortenhchristiansen thelanguagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT mortenhchristiansen thelanguagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT nickechater thelanguagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT mortenhchristiansen languagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT mortenhchristiansen languagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT mortenhchristiansen languagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
AT nickechater languagefacultythatwasn39tausagebasedaccountofnaturallanguagerecursion
_version_ 1725539930495516672