Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation
Abstract Background National Clinical Audits (NCAs) are a well-established quality improvement strategy used in healthcare settings. Significant resources, including clinicians’ time, are invested in participating in NCAs, yet there is variation in the extent to which the resulting feedback stimulat...
Main Authors: | Natasha Alvarado, Lynn McVey, Joanne Greenhalgh, Dawn Dowding, Mamas Mamas, Chris Gale, Patrick Doherty, Rebecca Randell |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05661-0 |
Similar Items
-
Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation
by: Alvarado, Natasha, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Hidden labour: the skilful work of clinical audit data collection and its implications for secondary use of data via integrated health IT
by: Lynn McVey, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Institutional use of National Clinical Audits by healthcare providers
by: McVey, Lynn, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Hidden labour: The skilful work of clinical audit data collection and its implications for secondary use of data via integrated health IT
by: McVey, Lynn, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence
by: Wouter T. Gude, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)