A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment

The objective of this study is to evaluate the relative priority of nine developed countries as a home country for foreign direct investment (FDI) from the vantage point of the United States during three time periods: pre-crisis (2004-2006), crisis (2007-2009), and post-crisis (2010-2012). Our study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Korhan K. Gokmenoglu, Shahram Alaghemand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Operational Research Society 2015-10-01
Series:Croatian Operational Research Review
Subjects:
FDI
AHP
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=218182
id doaj-1b2ae499ac964d4abcc9fe411591a08a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b2ae499ac964d4abcc9fe411591a08a2020-11-25T00:41:09ZengCroatian Operational Research SocietyCroatian Operational Research Review1848-02251848-99312015-10-016248951010.17535/crorr.2015.0037A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investmentKorhan K. Gokmenoglu0Shahram Alaghemand1Banking and Financing Department, Eastern Mediterranean University, North Cyprus via Mersin, TurkeyBanking and Financing Department, Eastern Mediterranean University, North Cyprus via Mersin, TurkeyThe objective of this study is to evaluate the relative priority of nine developed countries as a home country for foreign direct investment (FDI) from the vantage point of the United States during three time periods: pre-crisis (2004-2006), crisis (2007-2009), and post-crisis (2010-2012). Our study suggests a methodology based on a combination of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and the multi-period multi-attribute decision-making (MP-MADM) technique. To investigate our research question, we selected fifteen robust FDI determinants from recent studies. The results for all three time periods show that productivity, market potential, market size, GDP growth and development have the highest priority in the decision-making process. On the other hand, we found that the 2007 global financial crisis significantly affected each variable in the decision-making process. During the crisis, two variables in particular - corruption and GDP growth - significantly increased in importance. These findings have far-reaching policy implications and can assist policymakers and investors in their strategic decision-making process.http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=218182FDIAHPTOPSISMP-MA decision making
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Korhan K. Gokmenoglu
Shahram Alaghemand
spellingShingle Korhan K. Gokmenoglu
Shahram Alaghemand
A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
Croatian Operational Research Review
FDI
AHP
TOPSIS
MP-MA decision making
author_facet Korhan K. Gokmenoglu
Shahram Alaghemand
author_sort Korhan K. Gokmenoglu
title A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
title_short A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
title_full A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
title_fullStr A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
title_full_unstemmed A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
title_sort multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating priorities for foreign direct investment
publisher Croatian Operational Research Society
series Croatian Operational Research Review
issn 1848-0225
1848-9931
publishDate 2015-10-01
description The objective of this study is to evaluate the relative priority of nine developed countries as a home country for foreign direct investment (FDI) from the vantage point of the United States during three time periods: pre-crisis (2004-2006), crisis (2007-2009), and post-crisis (2010-2012). Our study suggests a methodology based on a combination of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and the multi-period multi-attribute decision-making (MP-MADM) technique. To investigate our research question, we selected fifteen robust FDI determinants from recent studies. The results for all three time periods show that productivity, market potential, market size, GDP growth and development have the highest priority in the decision-making process. On the other hand, we found that the 2007 global financial crisis significantly affected each variable in the decision-making process. During the crisis, two variables in particular - corruption and GDP growth - significantly increased in importance. These findings have far-reaching policy implications and can assist policymakers and investors in their strategic decision-making process.
topic FDI
AHP
TOPSIS
MP-MA decision making
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=218182
work_keys_str_mv AT korhankgokmenoglu amulticriteriadecisionmakingmodelforevaluatingprioritiesforforeigndirectinvestment
AT shahramalaghemand amulticriteriadecisionmakingmodelforevaluatingprioritiesforforeigndirectinvestment
AT korhankgokmenoglu multicriteriadecisionmakingmodelforevaluatingprioritiesforforeigndirectinvestment
AT shahramalaghemand multicriteriadecisionmakingmodelforevaluatingprioritiesforforeigndirectinvestment
_version_ 1725286969259327488