Affordances are Signs
Peirce and Whitehead share a common project: to restrict the over-extension of reductionism, to show how matter must be sensate and to create an ontology of process and subjectivity. This article claims that biosemiotics can assist this project. Moreover, it shows that the concept of affordance is a...
Main Author: | John Pickering |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
tripleC
2008-07-01
|
Series: | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/59 |
Similar Items
-
Affordances for robots: a brief survey
by: Thomas E. Horton, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Understanding affordances: history and contemporary development of Gibson’s central concept
by: Dobromir G. Dotov, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Remarks on the Foundations of Biology
by: Seán Ó Nualláin
Published: (2008-10-01) -
Everything seems so settled here: The conceivability of post-Peircean biosemiotics
by: Claudio J. Rodríguez Higuera
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Book Review: Signs of Science - Linguistics meets Biology
by: Robert Prinz
Published: (2011-06-01)