Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)

Abstract Objective Our study assessed perampanel monotherapy in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal‐onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS) in Japan and South Korea. Methods Study 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single‐arm, open‐label, Phase III study....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takamichi Yamamoto, Sung Chul Lim, Hirotomo Ninomiya, Yuichi Kubota, Won Chul Shin, Dong Wook Kim, Dong Jin Shin, Tohru Hoshida, Koji Iida, Taku Ochiai, Risa Matsunaga, Hiroyuki Higashiyama, Hidetaka Hiramatsu, Ji Hyun Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-06-01
Series:Epilepsia Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12398
id doaj-1b3a7afbb50e43ec83703003d882bf28
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b3a7afbb50e43ec83703003d882bf282020-11-25T03:25:25ZengWileyEpilepsia Open2470-92392020-06-015227428410.1002/epi4.12398Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)Takamichi Yamamoto0Sung Chul Lim1Hirotomo Ninomiya2Yuichi Kubota3Won Chul Shin4Dong Wook Kim5Dong Jin Shin6Tohru Hoshida7Koji Iida8Taku Ochiai9Risa Matsunaga10Hiroyuki Higashiyama11Hidetaka Hiramatsu12Ji Hyun Kim13Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital Hamamatsu JapanThe Catholic University of KoreaSt. Vincent Hospital Gyeonggi‐do Republic of KoreaItami City Hospital Hyogo JapanTMG Asaka Medical Center Saitama JapanKyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong Seoul Republic of KoreaKonkuk University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaGachon University Gil Medical Center Incheon Republic of KoreaNational Hospital Organization Nara Medical Center Nara JapanHiroshima University Hiroshima JapanOchiai Neurological Clinic Saitama JapanEisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo JapanFormerly: Eisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo JapanEisai Co., Ltd. Tokyo JapanKorea University Guro Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaAbstract Objective Our study assessed perampanel monotherapy in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal‐onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS) in Japan and South Korea. Methods Study 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single‐arm, open‐label, Phase III study. Patients initially received perampanel in a 32‐week 4‐mg/d Treatment Phase (6‐week Titration; 26‐week Maintenance Periods). If they experienced a seizure during the 4‐mg/d Maintenance Period, they could be up‐titrated to 8 mg/d across an additional 30‐week Treatment Phase (4‐week Titration; 26‐week Maintenance Periods). Primary endpoint was the seizure‐freedom rate during the Maintenance Period (4 mg/d and last evaluated dose [4 or 8 mg/d]). Secondary endpoints included time to first seizure onset and to withdrawal during Maintenance. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. Results At data cutoff (February 28, 2019), 89 patients with FOS (84 [94.4%] with newly diagnosed epilepsy and 5 [5.6%] with recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission) had received ≥1 perampanel dose; 16 patients discontinued during the 4‐mg/d Titration Period, meaning 73 patients entered the 4‐mg/d Maintenance Period and were included in the primary analysis set for efficacy. Seizure‐freedom rate in the 26‐week Maintenance Period was 46/73 (63.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.9‐74.0) at 4 mg/d and 54/73 (74.0%; 95% CI: 62.4‐83.5) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Cumulative probability of seizure‐onset and withdrawal rates during Maintenance was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.5‐43.0) and 23.7% (95% CI: 15.4‐35.3) at 4 mg/d, and 18.2% (95% CI: 11.0‐29.3) and 23.3% (95% CI: 15.2‐34.8) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Perampanel was generally well tolerated, and the most common TEAE was dizziness. Significance Perampanel monotherapy (4 to 8 mg/d) was efficacious and consistent with the known safety profile up to 26 weeks in patients (≥12 years) with primarily newly diagnosed FOS with or without FBTCS.https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12398antiepileptic drugfocal‐onset seizuresmonotherapyperampanelseizure freedom
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takamichi Yamamoto
Sung Chul Lim
Hirotomo Ninomiya
Yuichi Kubota
Won Chul Shin
Dong Wook Kim
Dong Jin Shin
Tohru Hoshida
Koji Iida
Taku Ochiai
Risa Matsunaga
Hiroyuki Higashiyama
Hidetaka Hiramatsu
Ji Hyun Kim
spellingShingle Takamichi Yamamoto
Sung Chul Lim
Hirotomo Ninomiya
Yuichi Kubota
Won Chul Shin
Dong Wook Kim
Dong Jin Shin
Tohru Hoshida
Koji Iida
Taku Ochiai
Risa Matsunaga
Hiroyuki Higashiyama
Hidetaka Hiramatsu
Ji Hyun Kim
Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
Epilepsia Open
antiepileptic drug
focal‐onset seizures
monotherapy
perampanel
seizure freedom
author_facet Takamichi Yamamoto
Sung Chul Lim
Hirotomo Ninomiya
Yuichi Kubota
Won Chul Shin
Dong Wook Kim
Dong Jin Shin
Tohru Hoshida
Koji Iida
Taku Ochiai
Risa Matsunaga
Hiroyuki Higashiyama
Hidetaka Hiramatsu
Ji Hyun Kim
author_sort Takamichi Yamamoto
title Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
title_short Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
title_full Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open‐label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)
title_sort efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: the open‐label study 342 (freedom study)
publisher Wiley
series Epilepsia Open
issn 2470-9239
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Objective Our study assessed perampanel monotherapy in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal‐onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS) in Japan and South Korea. Methods Study 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single‐arm, open‐label, Phase III study. Patients initially received perampanel in a 32‐week 4‐mg/d Treatment Phase (6‐week Titration; 26‐week Maintenance Periods). If they experienced a seizure during the 4‐mg/d Maintenance Period, they could be up‐titrated to 8 mg/d across an additional 30‐week Treatment Phase (4‐week Titration; 26‐week Maintenance Periods). Primary endpoint was the seizure‐freedom rate during the Maintenance Period (4 mg/d and last evaluated dose [4 or 8 mg/d]). Secondary endpoints included time to first seizure onset and to withdrawal during Maintenance. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. Results At data cutoff (February 28, 2019), 89 patients with FOS (84 [94.4%] with newly diagnosed epilepsy and 5 [5.6%] with recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission) had received ≥1 perampanel dose; 16 patients discontinued during the 4‐mg/d Titration Period, meaning 73 patients entered the 4‐mg/d Maintenance Period and were included in the primary analysis set for efficacy. Seizure‐freedom rate in the 26‐week Maintenance Period was 46/73 (63.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.9‐74.0) at 4 mg/d and 54/73 (74.0%; 95% CI: 62.4‐83.5) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Cumulative probability of seizure‐onset and withdrawal rates during Maintenance was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.5‐43.0) and 23.7% (95% CI: 15.4‐35.3) at 4 mg/d, and 18.2% (95% CI: 11.0‐29.3) and 23.3% (95% CI: 15.2‐34.8) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Perampanel was generally well tolerated, and the most common TEAE was dizziness. Significance Perampanel monotherapy (4 to 8 mg/d) was efficacious and consistent with the known safety profile up to 26 weeks in patients (≥12 years) with primarily newly diagnosed FOS with or without FBTCS.
topic antiepileptic drug
focal‐onset seizures
monotherapy
perampanel
seizure freedom
url https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12398
work_keys_str_mv AT takamichiyamamoto efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT sungchullim efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT hirotomoninomiya efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT yuichikubota efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT wonchulshin efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT dongwookkim efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT dongjinshin efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT tohruhoshida efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT kojiiida efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT takuochiai efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT risamatsunaga efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT hiroyukihigashiyama efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT hidetakahiramatsu efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
AT jihyunkim efficacyandsafetyofperampanelmonotherapyinpatientswithfocalonsetseizureswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsyorrecurrenceofepilepsyafteraperiodofremissiontheopenlabelstudy342freedomstudy
_version_ 1724597172030144512