Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives Evaluation of remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, for effectiveness in adults with COVID-19.Data sources Electronic search for eligible articles of PubMed, Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 20 September 2020.Participants and study eligibility criteria Only rand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daisy Khera, Ankita Chugh, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Pushpinder Singh Khera, Surjit Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e048416.full
id doaj-1b44c932631c4c3f87208921658f6df4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b44c932631c4c3f87208921658f6df42021-08-07T17:02:56ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111610.1136/bmjopen-2020-048416Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysisDaisy Khera0Ankita Chugh1Vinay Kumar Chugh2Pushpinder Singh Khera3Surjit Singh4Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodphur, Jodhpur, IndiaDentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India1 Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India2 Pharmacology, AIIMS Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India Objectives Evaluation of remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, for effectiveness in adults with COVID-19.Data sources Electronic search for eligible articles of PubMed, Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 20 September 2020.Participants and study eligibility criteria Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 were included for meta-analysis.Interventions Remdesivir was compared with standard of care.Primary and secondary outcomes Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were time to clinical improvement and safety outcomes like serious adverse events, respiratory failure.Study appraisal and synthesis methods Data synthesis was done with Cochrane review manager 5 (RevMan) V.5.3. Cochrane risk of bias V.2.0 tool was used for methodological quality assessment. The GRADE pro GDT was applied for overall quality of evidence.Results 52 RCTs were screened and 4 studies were included in analysis, with total of 7324 patients. No mortality benefit was observed with remdesivir versus control group (OR=0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.07), p=0.30, moderate quality evidence). Significantly higher rates of clinical improvement (OR=1.52 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.87), p<0.0001, low quality) and faster time to clinical improvement (HR=1.28 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.46), p=0.0002, very low quality) was observed with remdesivir versus control group. Significant decrease was found in the risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.75 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), p=0.0003, low quality); however, no difference was found in the risk of respiratory failure (RR=0.85 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.77), p=0.67, very low quality evidence) with remdesivir.Conclusions As per the evidence from current review, remdesivir has shown no mortality benefit (moderate quality evidence) in the treatment of COVID-19. From a cost–benefit perspective, it is our personal opinion that it should not be recommended for use, especially in low and lower middle income countries.Trial registration number PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020189517.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e048416.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daisy Khera
Ankita Chugh
Vinay Kumar Chugh
Pushpinder Singh Khera
Surjit Singh
spellingShingle Daisy Khera
Ankita Chugh
Vinay Kumar Chugh
Pushpinder Singh Khera
Surjit Singh
Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open
author_facet Daisy Khera
Ankita Chugh
Vinay Kumar Chugh
Pushpinder Singh Khera
Surjit Singh
author_sort Daisy Khera
title Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of remdesivir in covid-19 caused by sars-cov-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Objectives Evaluation of remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, for effectiveness in adults with COVID-19.Data sources Electronic search for eligible articles of PubMed, Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 20 September 2020.Participants and study eligibility criteria Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 were included for meta-analysis.Interventions Remdesivir was compared with standard of care.Primary and secondary outcomes Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were time to clinical improvement and safety outcomes like serious adverse events, respiratory failure.Study appraisal and synthesis methods Data synthesis was done with Cochrane review manager 5 (RevMan) V.5.3. Cochrane risk of bias V.2.0 tool was used for methodological quality assessment. The GRADE pro GDT was applied for overall quality of evidence.Results 52 RCTs were screened and 4 studies were included in analysis, with total of 7324 patients. No mortality benefit was observed with remdesivir versus control group (OR=0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.07), p=0.30, moderate quality evidence). Significantly higher rates of clinical improvement (OR=1.52 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.87), p<0.0001, low quality) and faster time to clinical improvement (HR=1.28 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.46), p=0.0002, very low quality) was observed with remdesivir versus control group. Significant decrease was found in the risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.75 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), p=0.0003, low quality); however, no difference was found in the risk of respiratory failure (RR=0.85 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.77), p=0.67, very low quality evidence) with remdesivir.Conclusions As per the evidence from current review, remdesivir has shown no mortality benefit (moderate quality evidence) in the treatment of COVID-19. From a cost–benefit perspective, it is our personal opinion that it should not be recommended for use, especially in low and lower middle income countries.Trial registration number PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020189517.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e048416.full
work_keys_str_mv AT daisykhera efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ankitachugh efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vinaykumarchugh efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pushpindersinghkhera efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT surjitsingh efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721216803031482368