Bioinformatics methods for identification of amyloidogenic peptides show robustness to misannotated training data

• Main Authors: Natalia Szulc, Michał Burdukiewicz, Marlena Gąsior-Głogowska, Jakub W. Wojciechowski, Jarosław Chilimoniuk, Paweł Mackiewicz, Tomas Šneideris, Vytautas Smirnovas, Malgorzata Kotulska
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-04-01
• Series: Scientific Reports
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86530-6

Abstract Several disorders are related to amyloid aggregation of proteins, for example Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s diseases. Amyloid proteins form fibrils of aggregated beta structures. This is preceded by formation of oligomers—the most cytotoxic species. Determining amyloidogenicity is tedious and costly. The most reliable identification of amyloids is obtained with high resolution microscopies, such as electron microscopy or atomic force microscopy (AFM). More frequently, less expensive and faster methods are used, especially infrared (IR) spectroscopy or Thioflavin T staining. Different experimental methods are not always concurrent, especially when amyloid peptides do not readily form fibrils but oligomers. This may lead to peptide misclassification and mislabeling. Several bioinformatics methods have been proposed for in-silico identification of amyloids, many of them based on machine learning. The effectiveness of these methods heavily depends on accurate annotation of the reference training data obtained from in-vitro experiments. We study how robust are bioinformatics methods to weak supervision, encountering imperfect training data. AmyloGram and three other amyloid predictors were applied. The results proved that a certain degree of misannotation in the reference data can be eliminated by the bioinformatics tools, even if they belonged to their training set. The computational results are supported by new experiments with IR and AFM methods.