Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality

Pescara was born from the merger of two small existing towns, in 1926. The new town thus feels like a place with no past, no history; something that is far from the truth. This notion has endorsed the ongoing demolition and replacement, even in recent times. An initial survey of the architectural he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Claudio Varagnoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria 2016-06-01
Series:ArcHistoR Architettura Storia Restauro - Architecture History Restoration
Online Access:http://pkp.unirc.it/ojs/index.php/archistor/article/view/66
id doaj-1b6b9ad806da4119aef933373f2a1fa7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b6b9ad806da4119aef933373f2a1fa72020-11-24T21:56:40ZengUniversità Mediterranea di Reggio CalabriaArcHistoR Architettura Storia Restauro - Architecture History Restoration2384-88982016-06-010516819710.14633/AHR03042Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and realityClaudio Varagnoli0Università degli Studi "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti - PescaraPescara was born from the merger of two small existing towns, in 1926. The new town thus feels like a place with no past, no history; something that is far from the truth. This notion has endorsed the ongoing demolition and replacement, even in recent times. An initial survey of the architectural heritage carried out by L. Bartolini Salimbeni, in 1994, highlighted considerable architectural heritage, that should have been defended by a variant of the urban master plan approved in 2007. However, recent demolitions of buildings of a certain importance (the Porta Nuova Station, the former Centrale del Latte, a textile mill from the early twentieth century) proceed amid protests from citizens and associations. The Town Hall tried to remedy the situation, entrusting revision of the current urban master plan to a group of experts, who extended the work of Bartolini Salimbeni. However, the Administrative Court rejected these and other attempts of protection, disputing the application of restrictive rules on the part of the Town Hall: only the Superintendence, the local office of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, in fact, may apply such restrictions. The essay highlights the need to improve alternative means of protection instead of traditional ways. However, it also points out that, in Italy, the economic and financial aspects of “heritage” still prevail. New dangers threaten other important buildings, such as the Adriatic Stadium, designed by Luigi Piccinato (1952-56). The issue not only concerns the preservation of monuments, but also the quality of life of the inhabitants. The risk is that our towns will be reduced to mere merchandise. Keywords: Pescara, Conservation, Nineteenth century, Demolitions, Heritagehttp://pkp.unirc.it/ojs/index.php/archistor/article/view/66
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claudio Varagnoli
spellingShingle Claudio Varagnoli
Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality
ArcHistoR Architettura Storia Restauro - Architecture History Restoration
author_facet Claudio Varagnoli
author_sort Claudio Varagnoli
title Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality
title_short Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality
title_full Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality
title_fullStr Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality
title_full_unstemmed Heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in Pescara - myth and reality
title_sort heritage of convenience: protection of the 20th century in pescara - myth and reality
publisher Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria
series ArcHistoR Architettura Storia Restauro - Architecture History Restoration
issn 2384-8898
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Pescara was born from the merger of two small existing towns, in 1926. The new town thus feels like a place with no past, no history; something that is far from the truth. This notion has endorsed the ongoing demolition and replacement, even in recent times. An initial survey of the architectural heritage carried out by L. Bartolini Salimbeni, in 1994, highlighted considerable architectural heritage, that should have been defended by a variant of the urban master plan approved in 2007. However, recent demolitions of buildings of a certain importance (the Porta Nuova Station, the former Centrale del Latte, a textile mill from the early twentieth century) proceed amid protests from citizens and associations. The Town Hall tried to remedy the situation, entrusting revision of the current urban master plan to a group of experts, who extended the work of Bartolini Salimbeni. However, the Administrative Court rejected these and other attempts of protection, disputing the application of restrictive rules on the part of the Town Hall: only the Superintendence, the local office of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, in fact, may apply such restrictions. The essay highlights the need to improve alternative means of protection instead of traditional ways. However, it also points out that, in Italy, the economic and financial aspects of “heritage” still prevail. New dangers threaten other important buildings, such as the Adriatic Stadium, designed by Luigi Piccinato (1952-56). The issue not only concerns the preservation of monuments, but also the quality of life of the inhabitants. The risk is that our towns will be reduced to mere merchandise. Keywords: Pescara, Conservation, Nineteenth century, Demolitions, Heritage
url http://pkp.unirc.it/ojs/index.php/archistor/article/view/66
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiovaragnoli heritageofconvenienceprotectionofthe20thcenturyinpescaramythandreality
_version_ 1725857852331917312