Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring

In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for noninvasive beam size monitoring on particle accelerators. Ideally, these monitors should be cost effective and require little or no maintenance. These monitors should also be suitable for both linear and circular machines. Here, the experimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Bobb, R. Kieffer, T. Lefevre, S. Mazzoni, T. Aumeyr, P. Karataev, M. Billing, J. Conway, J. Shanks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2018-03-01
Series:Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.032801
id doaj-1ba326ec6b114c7fae127108674781b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ba326ec6b114c7fae127108674781b52020-11-25T00:12:37ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Accelerators and Beams2469-98882018-03-0121303280110.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.032801Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ringL. BobbR. KiefferT. LefevreS. MazzoniT. AumeyrP. KarataevM. BillingJ. ConwayJ. ShanksIn recent years, there has been an increasing demand for noninvasive beam size monitoring on particle accelerators. Ideally, these monitors should be cost effective and require little or no maintenance. These monitors should also be suitable for both linear and circular machines. Here, the experimental setup is described in detail, and the results from a diffraction radiation beam size monitor are presented. This monitor has been tested on the Cornell Electron Storage Ring using a 1 mA (1.6×10^{10} particles per bunch) single bunch electron beam at 2.1 GeV energy. Images of the target surface and the angular distribution of the emitted diffraction radiation were acquired at wavelengths of 400 and 600 nm. These measurements are compared to two analytical models.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.032801
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Bobb
R. Kieffer
T. Lefevre
S. Mazzoni
T. Aumeyr
P. Karataev
M. Billing
J. Conway
J. Shanks
spellingShingle L. Bobb
R. Kieffer
T. Lefevre
S. Mazzoni
T. Aumeyr
P. Karataev
M. Billing
J. Conway
J. Shanks
Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
author_facet L. Bobb
R. Kieffer
T. Lefevre
S. Mazzoni
T. Aumeyr
P. Karataev
M. Billing
J. Conway
J. Shanks
author_sort L. Bobb
title Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
title_short Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
title_full Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
title_fullStr Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
title_sort feasibility of diffraction radiation for noninvasive beam diagnostics as characterized in a storage ring
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
issn 2469-9888
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for noninvasive beam size monitoring on particle accelerators. Ideally, these monitors should be cost effective and require little or no maintenance. These monitors should also be suitable for both linear and circular machines. Here, the experimental setup is described in detail, and the results from a diffraction radiation beam size monitor are presented. This monitor has been tested on the Cornell Electron Storage Ring using a 1 mA (1.6×10^{10} particles per bunch) single bunch electron beam at 2.1 GeV energy. Images of the target surface and the angular distribution of the emitted diffraction radiation were acquired at wavelengths of 400 and 600 nm. These measurements are compared to two analytical models.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.032801
work_keys_str_mv AT lbobb feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT rkieffer feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT tlefevre feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT smazzoni feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT taumeyr feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT pkarataev feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT mbilling feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT jconway feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
AT jshanks feasibilityofdiffractionradiationfornoninvasivebeamdiagnosticsascharacterizedinastoragering
_version_ 1725398595796992000