Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene

With the accumulating evidence of changing disturbance regimes becoming increasingly obvious, there is potential for disturbance ecology to become the most valuable lens through which climate-related disturbance events are interpreted. In this paper, I revisit some of the central themes of disturban...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erica A. Newman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00147/full
id doaj-1bb96e389b4344458e5f0e41ee5d69cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1bb96e389b4344458e5f0e41ee5d69cc2020-11-25T01:08:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2019-05-01710.3389/fevo.2019.00147439541Disturbance Ecology in the AnthropoceneErica A. NewmanWith the accumulating evidence of changing disturbance regimes becoming increasingly obvious, there is potential for disturbance ecology to become the most valuable lens through which climate-related disturbance events are interpreted. In this paper, I revisit some of the central themes of disturbance ecology and argue that the knowledge established in the field of disturbance ecology continues to be relevant to ecosystem management, even with rapid changes to disturbance regimes and changing disturbance types in local ecosystems. Disturbance ecology has been tremendously successful over the past several decades at elucidating the interactions between disturbances, biodiversity, and ecosystems, and this knowledge can be leveraged in different contexts. Primarily, management in changing and uncertain conditions should be focused primarily on the long-term persistence of that native biodiversity that has evolved within the local disturbance regime and is likely to go extinct with rapid changes to disturbance intensity, frequency, and type. Where possible, conserving aspects of natural disturbance regimes will be vital to preserving functioning ecosystems and to that native biodiversity that requires disturbance for its continued existence, though these situations may become more limited over time. Finally, scientists must actively propose management policies that incorporate knowledge of disturbance ecology. Successful policies regarding changing disturbance regimes for biodiversity will not merely be reactive, and will recognize that for natural ecosystems as for human society, not all desired outcomes are simultaneously possible.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00147/fullanthropogenic changedisturbance ecologydisturbance regimeslandscape ecologynatural disturbanceswildfire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erica A. Newman
spellingShingle Erica A. Newman
Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
anthropogenic change
disturbance ecology
disturbance regimes
landscape ecology
natural disturbances
wildfire
author_facet Erica A. Newman
author_sort Erica A. Newman
title Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene
title_short Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene
title_full Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene
title_fullStr Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene
title_full_unstemmed Disturbance Ecology in the Anthropocene
title_sort disturbance ecology in the anthropocene
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
issn 2296-701X
publishDate 2019-05-01
description With the accumulating evidence of changing disturbance regimes becoming increasingly obvious, there is potential for disturbance ecology to become the most valuable lens through which climate-related disturbance events are interpreted. In this paper, I revisit some of the central themes of disturbance ecology and argue that the knowledge established in the field of disturbance ecology continues to be relevant to ecosystem management, even with rapid changes to disturbance regimes and changing disturbance types in local ecosystems. Disturbance ecology has been tremendously successful over the past several decades at elucidating the interactions between disturbances, biodiversity, and ecosystems, and this knowledge can be leveraged in different contexts. Primarily, management in changing and uncertain conditions should be focused primarily on the long-term persistence of that native biodiversity that has evolved within the local disturbance regime and is likely to go extinct with rapid changes to disturbance intensity, frequency, and type. Where possible, conserving aspects of natural disturbance regimes will be vital to preserving functioning ecosystems and to that native biodiversity that requires disturbance for its continued existence, though these situations may become more limited over time. Finally, scientists must actively propose management policies that incorporate knowledge of disturbance ecology. Successful policies regarding changing disturbance regimes for biodiversity will not merely be reactive, and will recognize that for natural ecosystems as for human society, not all desired outcomes are simultaneously possible.
topic anthropogenic change
disturbance ecology
disturbance regimes
landscape ecology
natural disturbances
wildfire
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00147/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ericaanewman disturbanceecologyintheanthropocene
_version_ 1725183177294610432