Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model

The user inputs to OVERSEER® Nutrient Budgets (Overseer) allow farm-specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to be estimated. Since the development of the original model, life cycle assessment standards (e.g. PAS 2050) have been proposed and adopted for determining GHG or carbon footprints, which are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D.M. Wheeler, S.F. Ledgard, M. Boyes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731113000797
id doaj-1bca4452307f441fbaceacff90a28a04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1bca4452307f441fbaceacff90a28a042021-06-06T04:48:53ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112013-01-017437443Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® modelD.M. Wheeler0S.F. Ledgard1M. Boyes2AgResearch, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, 3240, New ZealandAgResearch, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, 3240, New ZealandAgResearch, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, 3240, New ZealandThe user inputs to OVERSEER® Nutrient Budgets (Overseer) allow farm-specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to be estimated. Since the development of the original model, life cycle assessment standards (e.g. PAS 2050) have been proposed and adopted for determining GHG or carbon footprints, which are usually reported as emissions per unit of product, for example, per kg milk, meat or wool. New Zealand pastoral farms frequently generate a range of products with different management practices. A robust system is required to allocate the individual sources of GHGs (e.g. methane, nitrous oxide, direct carbon dioxide and embodied carbon dioxide emissions for inputs used on the farm) to each product from a farm. This paper describes a method for allocating emissions to co-products from New Zealand farms. The method requires allocating the emissions, first, to an animal enterprise, separating the emissions between breeding and trading animals, and then allocating to a specific product to give product (e.g. milk, meat, wool, velvet) footprints from the ‘cradle-to-farm-gate’. The meat product was based on live-weight gain. Procedures were adopted so that emissions associated with rearing of young stock used in live-weight gain systems, both as a by-product or a primary product could be estimated. This allows the possibility of total emissions for a meat product to be built up from contributing farms along the production chain.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731113000797agriculturalcarbon footprintpastoral farminggreenhouse gas emissionslivestock products
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D.M. Wheeler
S.F. Ledgard
M. Boyes
spellingShingle D.M. Wheeler
S.F. Ledgard
M. Boyes
Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model
Animal
agricultural
carbon footprint
pastoral farming
greenhouse gas emissions
livestock products
author_facet D.M. Wheeler
S.F. Ledgard
M. Boyes
author_sort D.M. Wheeler
title Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model
title_short Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model
title_full Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model
title_fullStr Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model
title_full_unstemmed Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model
title_sort farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the overseer® model
publisher Elsevier
series Animal
issn 1751-7311
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The user inputs to OVERSEER® Nutrient Budgets (Overseer) allow farm-specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to be estimated. Since the development of the original model, life cycle assessment standards (e.g. PAS 2050) have been proposed and adopted for determining GHG or carbon footprints, which are usually reported as emissions per unit of product, for example, per kg milk, meat or wool. New Zealand pastoral farms frequently generate a range of products with different management practices. A robust system is required to allocate the individual sources of GHGs (e.g. methane, nitrous oxide, direct carbon dioxide and embodied carbon dioxide emissions for inputs used on the farm) to each product from a farm. This paper describes a method for allocating emissions to co-products from New Zealand farms. The method requires allocating the emissions, first, to an animal enterprise, separating the emissions between breeding and trading animals, and then allocating to a specific product to give product (e.g. milk, meat, wool, velvet) footprints from the ‘cradle-to-farm-gate’. The meat product was based on live-weight gain. Procedures were adopted so that emissions associated with rearing of young stock used in live-weight gain systems, both as a by-product or a primary product could be estimated. This allows the possibility of total emissions for a meat product to be built up from contributing farms along the production chain.
topic agricultural
carbon footprint
pastoral farming
greenhouse gas emissions
livestock products
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731113000797
work_keys_str_mv AT dmwheeler farmspecificcarbonfootprintingtothefarmgateforagriculturalcoproductsusingtheoverseermodel
AT sfledgard farmspecificcarbonfootprintingtothefarmgateforagriculturalcoproductsusingtheoverseermodel
AT mboyes farmspecificcarbonfootprintingtothefarmgateforagriculturalcoproductsusingtheoverseermodel
_version_ 1721395285988474880