Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Performance of specialty referrals is coming under scrutiny, but a lack of identifiable measures impedes measurement efforts. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify published measures that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guevara James P, Hsu Diane, Forrest Christopher B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/168
id doaj-1c9042c86e85475e9fc66ebc5988367b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c9042c86e85475e9fc66ebc5988367b2020-11-25T01:58:30ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-07-0111116810.1186/1472-6963-11-168Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literatureGuevara James PHsu DianeForrest Christopher B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Performance of specialty referrals is coming under scrutiny, but a lack of identifiable measures impedes measurement efforts. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify published measures that assess specialty referrals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a systematic review of the literature for measures of specialty referral. Searches were made of MEDLINE and HealthSTAR databases, references of eligible papers, and citations provided by content experts. Measures were eligible if they were published from January 1973 to June 2009, reported on validity and/or reliability of the measure, and were applicable to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development healthcare systems. We classified measures according to a conceptual framework, which underwent content validation with an expert panel.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 2,964 potentially eligible papers. After abstract and full-text review, we selected 214 papers containing 244 measures. Most measures were applied in adults (57%), assessed structural elements of the referral process (60%), and collected data via survey (62%). Measures were classified into non-mutually exclusive domains: need for specialty care (N = 14), referral initiation (N = 73), entry into specialty care (N = 53), coordination (N = 60), referral type (N = 3), clinical tasks (N = 19), resource use (N = 13), quality (N = 57), and outcomes (N = 9).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Published measures are available to assess the specialty referral process, although some domains are limited. Because many of these measures have been not been extensively validated in general populations, assess limited aspects of the referral process, and require new data collection, their applicability and preference in assessment of the specialty referral process is needed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/168Primary CareSpecialistsReferral-ConsultationCoordinationQuality of Care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guevara James P
Hsu Diane
Forrest Christopher B
spellingShingle Guevara James P
Hsu Diane
Forrest Christopher B
Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
BMC Health Services Research
Primary Care
Specialists
Referral-Consultation
Coordination
Quality of Care
author_facet Guevara James P
Hsu Diane
Forrest Christopher B
author_sort Guevara James P
title Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2011-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Performance of specialty referrals is coming under scrutiny, but a lack of identifiable measures impedes measurement efforts. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify published measures that assess specialty referrals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a systematic review of the literature for measures of specialty referral. Searches were made of MEDLINE and HealthSTAR databases, references of eligible papers, and citations provided by content experts. Measures were eligible if they were published from January 1973 to June 2009, reported on validity and/or reliability of the measure, and were applicable to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development healthcare systems. We classified measures according to a conceptual framework, which underwent content validation with an expert panel.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 2,964 potentially eligible papers. After abstract and full-text review, we selected 214 papers containing 244 measures. Most measures were applied in adults (57%), assessed structural elements of the referral process (60%), and collected data via survey (62%). Measures were classified into non-mutually exclusive domains: need for specialty care (N = 14), referral initiation (N = 73), entry into specialty care (N = 53), coordination (N = 60), referral type (N = 3), clinical tasks (N = 19), resource use (N = 13), quality (N = 57), and outcomes (N = 9).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Published measures are available to assess the specialty referral process, although some domains are limited. Because many of these measures have been not been extensively validated in general populations, assess limited aspects of the referral process, and require new data collection, their applicability and preference in assessment of the specialty referral process is needed.</p>
topic Primary Care
Specialists
Referral-Consultation
Coordination
Quality of Care
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/168
work_keys_str_mv AT guevarajamesp performancemeasuresofthespecialtyreferralprocessasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hsudiane performancemeasuresofthespecialtyreferralprocessasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT forrestchristopherb performancemeasuresofthespecialtyreferralprocessasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724969264597696512