Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Performance of specialty referrals is coming under scrutiny, but a lack of identifiable measures impedes measurement efforts. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify published measures that...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/168 |
id |
doaj-1c9042c86e85475e9fc66ebc5988367b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1c9042c86e85475e9fc66ebc5988367b2020-11-25T01:58:30ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-07-0111116810.1186/1472-6963-11-168Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literatureGuevara James PHsu DianeForrest Christopher B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Performance of specialty referrals is coming under scrutiny, but a lack of identifiable measures impedes measurement efforts. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify published measures that assess specialty referrals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a systematic review of the literature for measures of specialty referral. Searches were made of MEDLINE and HealthSTAR databases, references of eligible papers, and citations provided by content experts. Measures were eligible if they were published from January 1973 to June 2009, reported on validity and/or reliability of the measure, and were applicable to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development healthcare systems. We classified measures according to a conceptual framework, which underwent content validation with an expert panel.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 2,964 potentially eligible papers. After abstract and full-text review, we selected 214 papers containing 244 measures. Most measures were applied in adults (57%), assessed structural elements of the referral process (60%), and collected data via survey (62%). Measures were classified into non-mutually exclusive domains: need for specialty care (N = 14), referral initiation (N = 73), entry into specialty care (N = 53), coordination (N = 60), referral type (N = 3), clinical tasks (N = 19), resource use (N = 13), quality (N = 57), and outcomes (N = 9).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Published measures are available to assess the specialty referral process, although some domains are limited. Because many of these measures have been not been extensively validated in general populations, assess limited aspects of the referral process, and require new data collection, their applicability and preference in assessment of the specialty referral process is needed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/168Primary CareSpecialistsReferral-ConsultationCoordinationQuality of Care |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Guevara James P Hsu Diane Forrest Christopher B |
spellingShingle |
Guevara James P Hsu Diane Forrest Christopher B Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature BMC Health Services Research Primary Care Specialists Referral-Consultation Coordination Quality of Care |
author_facet |
Guevara James P Hsu Diane Forrest Christopher B |
author_sort |
Guevara James P |
title |
Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short |
Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full |
Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort |
performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2011-07-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Performance of specialty referrals is coming under scrutiny, but a lack of identifiable measures impedes measurement efforts. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify published measures that assess specialty referrals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a systematic review of the literature for measures of specialty referral. Searches were made of MEDLINE and HealthSTAR databases, references of eligible papers, and citations provided by content experts. Measures were eligible if they were published from January 1973 to June 2009, reported on validity and/or reliability of the measure, and were applicable to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development healthcare systems. We classified measures according to a conceptual framework, which underwent content validation with an expert panel.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 2,964 potentially eligible papers. After abstract and full-text review, we selected 214 papers containing 244 measures. Most measures were applied in adults (57%), assessed structural elements of the referral process (60%), and collected data via survey (62%). Measures were classified into non-mutually exclusive domains: need for specialty care (N = 14), referral initiation (N = 73), entry into specialty care (N = 53), coordination (N = 60), referral type (N = 3), clinical tasks (N = 19), resource use (N = 13), quality (N = 57), and outcomes (N = 9).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Published measures are available to assess the specialty referral process, although some domains are limited. Because many of these measures have been not been extensively validated in general populations, assess limited aspects of the referral process, and require new data collection, their applicability and preference in assessment of the specialty referral process is needed.</p> |
topic |
Primary Care Specialists Referral-Consultation Coordination Quality of Care |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/168 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guevarajamesp performancemeasuresofthespecialtyreferralprocessasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT hsudiane performancemeasuresofthespecialtyreferralprocessasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT forrestchristopherb performancemeasuresofthespecialtyreferralprocessasystematicreviewoftheliterature |
_version_ |
1724969264597696512 |