French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics
Science videos on YouTube attract millions of viewers each month, but little is known about who the content producers are, how they work and what their motivations and qualifications are. Here, we analyze the characteristics of 622 French YouTube science channels and 70,795 science videos in French,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.612667/full |
id |
doaj-1c9183e6eb8543f991144f43c9a79088 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1c9183e6eb8543f991144f43c9a790882021-04-28T15:02:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2021-04-01610.3389/fcomm.2021.612667612667French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel CharacteristicsStéphane Debove0Tobias Füchslin1Tania Louis2Pierre Masselot3Independent Researcher, Toulouse, FranceDepartment of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandIndependent Researcher, Albi, FranceDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United KingdomScience videos on YouTube attract millions of viewers each month, but little is known about who the content producers are, how they work and what their motivations and qualifications are. Here, we analyze the characteristics of 622 French YouTube science channels and 70,795 science videos in French, and complement this analysis with a survey of 180 of these youtubers. We focus on three questions: who are the science communicators (sociodemographics, resources, and goals), what are the characteristics of their channels, and are there differences between institutional and non-institutional communicators. We show that French science communicators on YouTube are mostly young men, highly qualified and usually talking about their topic of expertize. Many of them do not earn enough money to make a living out of this activity and have to use personal money to run their channels. At the same time, many are not interested in making this activity their main source of income. Their main goal is to share science and stimulate curiosity, as opposed to teach and entertain. While a small number of channels account for most of the views and subscribers, together they are able to cover a lot of scientific disciplines, with individuals usually focusing on a couple of fields and institutions talking about more diverse subjects. Institutions seem to have less success on YouTube than individuals, a result visible both in the number of subscribers and engagement received in videos (likes and comments). We discuss the potential factors behind this discrepancy, such as the lack of personality of institutional channels, the high number of topics they cover or the fact that institutions usually have an additional goal compared to individuals: to present and promote the institution itself. A video version of this article has been recorded and made available here: https://stephanedebove.net/youtubehttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.612667/fullscienceyoutubecommunicationinstitutionpopularization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stéphane Debove Tobias Füchslin Tania Louis Pierre Masselot |
spellingShingle |
Stéphane Debove Tobias Füchslin Tania Louis Pierre Masselot French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics Frontiers in Communication science youtube communication institution popularization |
author_facet |
Stéphane Debove Tobias Füchslin Tania Louis Pierre Masselot |
author_sort |
Stéphane Debove |
title |
French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics |
title_short |
French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics |
title_full |
French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics |
title_fullStr |
French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed |
French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and Institutional Communicators and Their Channel Characteristics |
title_sort |
french science communication on youtube: a survey of individual and institutional communicators and their channel characteristics |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Communication |
issn |
2297-900X |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Science videos on YouTube attract millions of viewers each month, but little is known about who the content producers are, how they work and what their motivations and qualifications are. Here, we analyze the characteristics of 622 French YouTube science channels and 70,795 science videos in French, and complement this analysis with a survey of 180 of these youtubers. We focus on three questions: who are the science communicators (sociodemographics, resources, and goals), what are the characteristics of their channels, and are there differences between institutional and non-institutional communicators. We show that French science communicators on YouTube are mostly young men, highly qualified and usually talking about their topic of expertize. Many of them do not earn enough money to make a living out of this activity and have to use personal money to run their channels. At the same time, many are not interested in making this activity their main source of income. Their main goal is to share science and stimulate curiosity, as opposed to teach and entertain. While a small number of channels account for most of the views and subscribers, together they are able to cover a lot of scientific disciplines, with individuals usually focusing on a couple of fields and institutions talking about more diverse subjects. Institutions seem to have less success on YouTube than individuals, a result visible both in the number of subscribers and engagement received in videos (likes and comments). We discuss the potential factors behind this discrepancy, such as the lack of personality of institutional channels, the high number of topics they cover or the fact that institutions usually have an additional goal compared to individuals: to present and promote the institution itself. A video version of this article has been recorded and made available here: https://stephanedebove.net/youtube |
topic |
science youtube communication institution popularization |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.612667/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephanedebove frenchsciencecommunicationonyoutubeasurveyofindividualandinstitutionalcommunicatorsandtheirchannelcharacteristics AT tobiasfuchslin frenchsciencecommunicationonyoutubeasurveyofindividualandinstitutionalcommunicatorsandtheirchannelcharacteristics AT tanialouis frenchsciencecommunicationonyoutubeasurveyofindividualandinstitutionalcommunicatorsandtheirchannelcharacteristics AT pierremasselot frenchsciencecommunicationonyoutubeasurveyofindividualandinstitutionalcommunicatorsandtheirchannelcharacteristics |
_version_ |
1721503431062978560 |