Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930)
Ecclesiastical courts, like civil courts, call on psychiatric expertise in criminal trials, especially where spouses are involved. Judges seek expert advice in determining whether one of the parties, presumably mentally deficient (furiosus), was competent to consent to, and take on, the obligations...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
L’Harmattan
2010-12-01
|
| Series: | Droit et Cultures |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/droitcultures/2256 |
| id |
doaj-1c96714665f64d8286ffc2dd4f27eed2 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-1c96714665f64d8286ffc2dd4f27eed22020-11-25T00:45:30ZfraL’HarmattanDroit et Cultures0247-97882109-94212010-12-0160Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930)Laurent KondratukEcclesiastical courts, like civil courts, call on psychiatric expertise in criminal trials, especially where spouses are involved. Judges seek expert advice in determining whether one of the parties, presumably mentally deficient (furiosus), was competent to consent to, and take on, the obligations of marriage. We review cases in which ecclesiastical courts resorted to psychiatric and even gynecological expertise. Next, we consider both doctrine and jurisprudence concerning the question of madness and sexual psychopathology (as was deemed homosexuality) in the nullification procedure, mainly during the first half of the twentieth century.http://journals.openedition.org/droitcultures/2256Canon LawHomosexualityMadnessMarriageRoman Rota |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
fra |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Laurent Kondratuk |
| spellingShingle |
Laurent Kondratuk Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) Droit et Cultures Canon Law Homosexuality Madness Marriage Roman Rota |
| author_facet |
Laurent Kondratuk |
| author_sort |
Laurent Kondratuk |
| title |
Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) |
| title_short |
Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) |
| title_full |
Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) |
| title_fullStr |
Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) |
| title_sort |
le recours à l’expertise psychiatrique dans les juridictions ecclésiastiques (1850-1930) |
| publisher |
L’Harmattan |
| series |
Droit et Cultures |
| issn |
0247-9788 2109-9421 |
| publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
| description |
Ecclesiastical courts, like civil courts, call on psychiatric expertise in criminal trials, especially where spouses are involved. Judges seek expert advice in determining whether one of the parties, presumably mentally deficient (furiosus), was competent to consent to, and take on, the obligations of marriage. We review cases in which ecclesiastical courts resorted to psychiatric and even gynecological expertise. Next, we consider both doctrine and jurisprudence concerning the question of madness and sexual psychopathology (as was deemed homosexuality) in the nullification procedure, mainly during the first half of the twentieth century. |
| topic |
Canon Law Homosexuality Madness Marriage Roman Rota |
| url |
http://journals.openedition.org/droitcultures/2256 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT laurentkondratuk lerecoursalexpertisepsychiatriquedanslesjuridictionsecclesiastiques18501930 |
| _version_ |
1725269740249677824 |