A framework for lotic macrosystem research

Abstract We analyze here the nature of research in freshwater macrosystem biology (especially lotic studies) from both conceptual and current research perspectives. The boundaries of permanent and transitional lotic macrosystems from the smallest to largest spatial extents are described. We contrast...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James H. Thorp, Walter K. Dodds, Caleb J. Robbins, Alain Maasri, Emily R. Arsenault, Jackob A. Lutchen, Flavia Tromboni, Barbara Hayford, Mark Pyron, Gregory S. Mathews, Anne Schechner, Sudeep Chandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-02-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3342
Description
Summary:Abstract We analyze here the nature of research in freshwater macrosystem biology (especially lotic studies) from both conceptual and current research perspectives. The boundaries of permanent and transitional lotic macrosystems from the smallest to largest spatial extents are described. We contrast ecosystem vs. macrosystem research and macroecology vs. macrosystems ecology and provide some examples of representative aquatic macrosystems ecology projects in the USA. We recommend approaches for incorporating certain large‐scale lotic concepts developed over the last 40 yr as the bases for lotic macrosystem studies. Of these, the three most appropriate in chronological order are the River Continuum Concept, the Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis, and the Stream Biome Gradient Concept. Four other concepts would be suitable for testing macrosystem hypotheses after incorporating small to large conceptual or geographic expansions of the models. We suggest future research directions in lotic macrosystem research in areas of climate change and teleconnections among distant organisms and systems and include general recommendations for conducting macrosystem‐level research.
ISSN:2150-8925