O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda

Analysing Slovenian sociological production of knowledge about the Romani people, the article problematises the question of epistemological choice in studying social reality. These studies can serve as a case study in examining the complex yet systematised relationship between the changes in social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ana Podvršič
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts) 2013-08-01
Series:Ars & Humanitas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/743
id doaj-1ccf25523f184768b4558b079b8266b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ccf25523f184768b4558b079b8266b82021-04-02T13:46:21ZdeuZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)Ars & Humanitas1854-96322350-42182013-08-0171677710.4312/ars.7.1.67-77743O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna vedaAna PodvršičAnalysing Slovenian sociological production of knowledge about the Romani people, the article problematises the question of epistemological choice in studying social reality. These studies can serve as a case study in examining the complex yet systematised relationship between the changes in social reality and the academic discourse. As an object of inquiry, the Romani people have been introduced in the Slovenian academic discourse after Slovenia’s independence and particularly during the period of the accession to the European Union, when Romani people have been granted the status of an ethnic minority. The prevailing studies, which are primarily based in cultural studies, call, together with minority law, for an improvement of the situation of Romani communities, starting with ending discrimination. However, the discourse on the Romani people as an underprivileged minority cannot reflect on the presuppositions of its own practice. Hence, by identifying the normative discourse of the nation-state with the analytical discourse, and by approaching ethnic groups as givens, it works against the very position that it tries to defend; by unknowingly supporting neoliberal policies, it contributes to the reproduction of the existent relations of inequality.https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/743Romiakademski diskurzkulturni študijineoliberalizem
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Podvršič
spellingShingle Ana Podvršič
O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
Ars & Humanitas
Romi
akademski diskurz
kulturni študiji
neoliberalizem
author_facet Ana Podvršič
author_sort Ana Podvršič
title O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
title_short O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
title_full O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
title_fullStr O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
title_full_unstemmed O epistemološki izbiri: Gypsy Studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
title_sort o epistemološki izbiri: gypsy studies kot slovenska državotvorna veda
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)
series Ars & Humanitas
issn 1854-9632
2350-4218
publishDate 2013-08-01
description Analysing Slovenian sociological production of knowledge about the Romani people, the article problematises the question of epistemological choice in studying social reality. These studies can serve as a case study in examining the complex yet systematised relationship between the changes in social reality and the academic discourse. As an object of inquiry, the Romani people have been introduced in the Slovenian academic discourse after Slovenia’s independence and particularly during the period of the accession to the European Union, when Romani people have been granted the status of an ethnic minority. The prevailing studies, which are primarily based in cultural studies, call, together with minority law, for an improvement of the situation of Romani communities, starting with ending discrimination. However, the discourse on the Romani people as an underprivileged minority cannot reflect on the presuppositions of its own practice. Hence, by identifying the normative discourse of the nation-state with the analytical discourse, and by approaching ethnic groups as givens, it works against the very position that it tries to defend; by unknowingly supporting neoliberal policies, it contributes to the reproduction of the existent relations of inequality.
topic Romi
akademski diskurz
kulturni študiji
neoliberalizem
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/743
work_keys_str_mv AT anapodvrsic oepistemoloskiizbirigypsystudieskotslovenskadrzavotvornaveda
_version_ 1721563903319605248