CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers

CRISPR-Cas immune systems in bacteria and archaea record prior infections as spacers within each system’s CRISPR arrays. Spacers are normally derived from invasive genetic material and direct the immune system to complementary targets as part of future infections. However, not all spacers appear to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franziska Wimmer, Chase L. Beisel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03078/full
id doaj-1ce97188a91f4771ae6a15e69bcb2afb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ce97188a91f4771ae6a15e69bcb2afb2020-11-25T02:56:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2020-01-011010.3389/fmicb.2019.03078495190CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting SpacersFranziska Wimmer0Chase L. Beisel1Chase L. Beisel2Helmholtz Institute for RNA-Based Infection Research (HIRI), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Würzburg, GermanyHelmholtz Institute for RNA-Based Infection Research (HIRI), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Würzburg, GermanyMedical Faculty, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyCRISPR-Cas immune systems in bacteria and archaea record prior infections as spacers within each system’s CRISPR arrays. Spacers are normally derived from invasive genetic material and direct the immune system to complementary targets as part of future infections. However, not all spacers appear to be derived from foreign genetic material and instead can originate from the host genome. Their presence poses a paradox, as self-targeting spacers would be expected to induce an autoimmune response and cell death. In this review, we discuss the known frequency of self-targeting spacers in natural CRISPR-Cas systems, how these spacers can be incorporated into CRISPR arrays, and how the host can evade lethal attack. We also discuss how self-targeting spacers can become the basis for alternative functions performed by CRISPR-Cas systems that extend beyond adaptive immunity. Overall, the acquisition of genome-targeting spacers poses a substantial risk but can aid in the host’s evolution and potentially lead to or support new functionalities.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03078/fullCRISPR-Casspacer acquisitionanti-CRISPR proteinsautoimmunitygene regulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franziska Wimmer
Chase L. Beisel
Chase L. Beisel
spellingShingle Franziska Wimmer
Chase L. Beisel
Chase L. Beisel
CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
Frontiers in Microbiology
CRISPR-Cas
spacer acquisition
anti-CRISPR proteins
autoimmunity
gene regulation
author_facet Franziska Wimmer
Chase L. Beisel
Chase L. Beisel
author_sort Franziska Wimmer
title CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
title_short CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
title_full CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
title_fullStr CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
title_full_unstemmed CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
title_sort crispr-cas systems and the paradox of self-targeting spacers
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description CRISPR-Cas immune systems in bacteria and archaea record prior infections as spacers within each system’s CRISPR arrays. Spacers are normally derived from invasive genetic material and direct the immune system to complementary targets as part of future infections. However, not all spacers appear to be derived from foreign genetic material and instead can originate from the host genome. Their presence poses a paradox, as self-targeting spacers would be expected to induce an autoimmune response and cell death. In this review, we discuss the known frequency of self-targeting spacers in natural CRISPR-Cas systems, how these spacers can be incorporated into CRISPR arrays, and how the host can evade lethal attack. We also discuss how self-targeting spacers can become the basis for alternative functions performed by CRISPR-Cas systems that extend beyond adaptive immunity. Overall, the acquisition of genome-targeting spacers poses a substantial risk but can aid in the host’s evolution and potentially lead to or support new functionalities.
topic CRISPR-Cas
spacer acquisition
anti-CRISPR proteins
autoimmunity
gene regulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03078/full
work_keys_str_mv AT franziskawimmer crisprcassystemsandtheparadoxofselftargetingspacers
AT chaselbeisel crisprcassystemsandtheparadoxofselftargetingspacers
AT chaselbeisel crisprcassystemsandtheparadoxofselftargetingspacers
_version_ 1724714298513555456