Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.

Embodied/modality-specific theories of semantic memory propose that sensorimotor representations play an important role in perception and action. A large body of evidence supports the notion that concepts involving human motor action (i.e., semantic-motor representations) are processed in both langu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy D Rodriguez, Matthew L McCabe, Joe R Nocera, Jamie Reilly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3352888?pdf=render
id doaj-1d0c25c8ac0c4c47af99f63cda931c08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d0c25c8ac0c4c47af99f63cda931c082020-11-25T02:40:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0175e3709410.1371/journal.pone.0037094Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.Amy D RodriguezMatthew L McCabeJoe R NoceraJamie ReillyEmbodied/modality-specific theories of semantic memory propose that sensorimotor representations play an important role in perception and action. A large body of evidence supports the notion that concepts involving human motor action (i.e., semantic-motor representations) are processed in both language and motor regions of the brain. However, most studies have focused on perceptual tasks, leaving unanswered questions about language-motor interaction during production tasks. Thus, we investigated the effects of shared semantic-motor representations on concurrent language and motor production tasks in healthy young adults, manipulating the semantic task (motor-related vs. nonmotor-related words) and the motor task (i.e., standing still and finger-tapping). In Experiment 1 (n = 20), we demonstrated that motor-related word generation was sufficient to affect postural control. In Experiment 2 (n = 40), we demonstrated that motor-related word generation was sufficient to facilitate word generation and finger tapping. We conclude that engaging semantic-motor representations can have a reciprocal influence on motor and language production. Our study provides additional support for functional language-motor interaction, as well as embodied/modality-specific theories.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3352888?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amy D Rodriguez
Matthew L McCabe
Joe R Nocera
Jamie Reilly
spellingShingle Amy D Rodriguez
Matthew L McCabe
Joe R Nocera
Jamie Reilly
Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Amy D Rodriguez
Matthew L McCabe
Joe R Nocera
Jamie Reilly
author_sort Amy D Rodriguez
title Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
title_short Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
title_full Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
title_fullStr Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
title_sort concurrent word generation and motor performance: further evidence for language-motor interaction.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Embodied/modality-specific theories of semantic memory propose that sensorimotor representations play an important role in perception and action. A large body of evidence supports the notion that concepts involving human motor action (i.e., semantic-motor representations) are processed in both language and motor regions of the brain. However, most studies have focused on perceptual tasks, leaving unanswered questions about language-motor interaction during production tasks. Thus, we investigated the effects of shared semantic-motor representations on concurrent language and motor production tasks in healthy young adults, manipulating the semantic task (motor-related vs. nonmotor-related words) and the motor task (i.e., standing still and finger-tapping). In Experiment 1 (n = 20), we demonstrated that motor-related word generation was sufficient to affect postural control. In Experiment 2 (n = 40), we demonstrated that motor-related word generation was sufficient to facilitate word generation and finger tapping. We conclude that engaging semantic-motor representations can have a reciprocal influence on motor and language production. Our study provides additional support for functional language-motor interaction, as well as embodied/modality-specific theories.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3352888?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT amydrodriguez concurrentwordgenerationandmotorperformancefurtherevidenceforlanguagemotorinteraction
AT matthewlmccabe concurrentwordgenerationandmotorperformancefurtherevidenceforlanguagemotorinteraction
AT joernocera concurrentwordgenerationandmotorperformancefurtherevidenceforlanguagemotorinteraction
AT jamiereilly concurrentwordgenerationandmotorperformancefurtherevidenceforlanguagemotorinteraction
_version_ 1724783646358896640