Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although there are wide variations in mortality between developed and developing countries, socioeconomic inequalities in health exist in both the societies. The study examined socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Streatfield Peter, Razzaque Abdur, Gwatkin Dave R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-06-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Online Access:http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/6/1/4
id doaj-1d0c5b41ca884fe7b7e21c1a9d43546b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d0c5b41ca884fe7b7e21c1a9d43546b2020-11-25T02:30:07ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762007-06-0161410.1186/1475-9276-6-4Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, BangladeshStreatfield PeterRazzaque AbdurGwatkin Dave R<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although there are wide variations in mortality between developed and developing countries, socioeconomic inequalities in health exist in both the societies. The study examined socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality using data from the Matlab Health and Demographic Surveillance System of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Four birth cohorts (1983–85, 1988–90, 1993–95, 1998–00) were followed for five years for death and out-migration in two adjacent areas (ICDDR,B-service and government-service) with similar socioeconomic but differ health services. Based on asset quintiles, inequality was measured through both poor-rich ratio and concentration index.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The study found that the socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and under-five mortality increased over time in both the ICDDR,B-service and government-service areas but it declined substantially for 1–4 years in the ICDDR,B- service area.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The study concluded that usual health intervention programs (non-targeted) do not reduce poor-rich gap, rather the gap increases initially but might decrease in long run if the program is very intensive.</p> http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/6/1/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Streatfield Peter
Razzaque Abdur
Gwatkin Dave R
spellingShingle Streatfield Peter
Razzaque Abdur
Gwatkin Dave R
Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh
International Journal for Equity in Health
author_facet Streatfield Peter
Razzaque Abdur
Gwatkin Dave R
author_sort Streatfield Peter
title Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh
title_short Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh
title_full Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh
title_fullStr Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh
title_sort does health intervention improve socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality? evidence from matlab, bangladesh
publisher BMC
series International Journal for Equity in Health
issn 1475-9276
publishDate 2007-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although there are wide variations in mortality between developed and developing countries, socioeconomic inequalities in health exist in both the societies. The study examined socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and child mortality using data from the Matlab Health and Demographic Surveillance System of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Four birth cohorts (1983–85, 1988–90, 1993–95, 1998–00) were followed for five years for death and out-migration in two adjacent areas (ICDDR,B-service and government-service) with similar socioeconomic but differ health services. Based on asset quintiles, inequality was measured through both poor-rich ratio and concentration index.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The study found that the socioeconomic inequalities of neonatal, infant and under-five mortality increased over time in both the ICDDR,B-service and government-service areas but it declined substantially for 1–4 years in the ICDDR,B- service area.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The study concluded that usual health intervention programs (non-targeted) do not reduce poor-rich gap, rather the gap increases initially but might decrease in long run if the program is very intensive.</p>
url http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/6/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT streatfieldpeter doeshealthinterventionimprovesocioeconomicinequalitiesofneonatalinfantandchildmortalityevidencefrommatlabbangladesh
AT razzaqueabdur doeshealthinterventionimprovesocioeconomicinequalitiesofneonatalinfantandchildmortalityevidencefrommatlabbangladesh
AT gwatkindaver doeshealthinterventionimprovesocioeconomicinequalitiesofneonatalinfantandchildmortalityevidencefrommatlabbangladesh
_version_ 1724829853888282624