Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
We present an abstract discretization framework and demonstrate that various cell-centered and hybrid finite-volume schemes fit into it. The different schemes considered in this work are then analyzed numerically for an elliptic model problem with respect to the properties consistency, coercivity, e...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Oil & Gas Science and Technology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018064 |
id |
doaj-1d2757fe83dd4c8dba3b8ca02b079107 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1d2757fe83dd4c8dba3b8ca02b0791072021-03-02T09:30:13ZengEDP SciencesOil & Gas Science and Technology1294-44751953-81892018-01-01738210.2516/ogst/2018064ogst180050Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problemsSchneider MartinGläser DennisFlemisch BerndHelmig RainerWe present an abstract discretization framework and demonstrate that various cell-centered and hybrid finite-volume schemes fit into it. The different schemes considered in this work are then analyzed numerically for an elliptic model problem with respect to the properties consistency, coercivity, extremum principles, and sparsity. The test cases presented comprise of two- and three-dimensional setups, mildly and highly anisotropic tensors and grids of different complexities. The results show that all schemes show a similar convergence behavior, except for the two-point flux approximation scheme, and seem to be coercive. Furthermore, they confirm that linear schemes, in contrast to nonlinear schemes, are in general neither positivity-preserving nor satisfy discrete minimum or maximum principles.https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018064 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Schneider Martin Gläser Dennis Flemisch Bernd Helmig Rainer |
spellingShingle |
Schneider Martin Gläser Dennis Flemisch Bernd Helmig Rainer Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems Oil & Gas Science and Technology |
author_facet |
Schneider Martin Gläser Dennis Flemisch Bernd Helmig Rainer |
author_sort |
Schneider Martin |
title |
Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems |
title_short |
Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems |
title_full |
Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems |
title_sort |
comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
Oil & Gas Science and Technology |
issn |
1294-4475 1953-8189 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
We present an abstract discretization framework and demonstrate that various cell-centered and hybrid finite-volume schemes fit into it. The different schemes considered in this work are then analyzed numerically for an elliptic model problem with respect to the properties consistency, coercivity, extremum principles, and sparsity. The test cases presented comprise of two- and three-dimensional setups, mildly and highly anisotropic tensors and grids of different complexities. The results show that all schemes show a similar convergence behavior, except for the two-point flux approximation scheme, and seem to be coercive. Furthermore, they confirm that linear schemes, in contrast to nonlinear schemes, are in general neither positivity-preserving nor satisfy discrete minimum or maximum principles. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018064 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT schneidermartin comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems AT glaserdennis comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems AT flemischbernd comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems AT helmigrainer comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems |
_version_ |
1724239244070748160 |