Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems

We present an abstract discretization framework and demonstrate that various cell-centered and hybrid finite-volume schemes fit into it. The different schemes considered in this work are then analyzed numerically for an elliptic model problem with respect to the properties consistency, coercivity, e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schneider Martin, Gläser Dennis, Flemisch Bernd, Helmig Rainer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:Oil & Gas Science and Technology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018064
id doaj-1d2757fe83dd4c8dba3b8ca02b079107
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d2757fe83dd4c8dba3b8ca02b0791072021-03-02T09:30:13ZengEDP SciencesOil & Gas Science and Technology1294-44751953-81892018-01-01738210.2516/ogst/2018064ogst180050Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problemsSchneider MartinGläser DennisFlemisch BerndHelmig RainerWe present an abstract discretization framework and demonstrate that various cell-centered and hybrid finite-volume schemes fit into it. The different schemes considered in this work are then analyzed numerically for an elliptic model problem with respect to the properties consistency, coercivity, extremum principles, and sparsity. The test cases presented comprise of two- and three-dimensional setups, mildly and highly anisotropic tensors and grids of different complexities. The results show that all schemes show a similar convergence behavior, except for the two-point flux approximation scheme, and seem to be coercive. Furthermore, they confirm that linear schemes, in contrast to nonlinear schemes, are in general neither positivity-preserving nor satisfy discrete minimum or maximum principles.https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018064
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Schneider Martin
Gläser Dennis
Flemisch Bernd
Helmig Rainer
spellingShingle Schneider Martin
Gläser Dennis
Flemisch Bernd
Helmig Rainer
Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
Oil & Gas Science and Technology
author_facet Schneider Martin
Gläser Dennis
Flemisch Bernd
Helmig Rainer
author_sort Schneider Martin
title Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
title_short Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
title_full Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
title_fullStr Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
title_sort comparison of finite-volume schemes for diffusion problems
publisher EDP Sciences
series Oil & Gas Science and Technology
issn 1294-4475
1953-8189
publishDate 2018-01-01
description We present an abstract discretization framework and demonstrate that various cell-centered and hybrid finite-volume schemes fit into it. The different schemes considered in this work are then analyzed numerically for an elliptic model problem with respect to the properties consistency, coercivity, extremum principles, and sparsity. The test cases presented comprise of two- and three-dimensional setups, mildly and highly anisotropic tensors and grids of different complexities. The results show that all schemes show a similar convergence behavior, except for the two-point flux approximation scheme, and seem to be coercive. Furthermore, they confirm that linear schemes, in contrast to nonlinear schemes, are in general neither positivity-preserving nor satisfy discrete minimum or maximum principles.
url https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018064
work_keys_str_mv AT schneidermartin comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems
AT glaserdennis comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems
AT flemischbernd comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems
AT helmigrainer comparisonoffinitevolumeschemesfordiffusionproblems
_version_ 1724239244070748160