Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.

BACKGROUND:The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines recommend intra-access flow (Qa) measurement as the preferred vascular access surveillance method over static intra-access pressure ratio (SIAPR). Recently, it has become possible to perform Qa measurement during hemodialys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoo Jin Choi, Young-Ki Lee, Hayne Cho Park, Eun Yi Kim, Ajin Cho, Chaehoon Han, Sun Ryoung Choi, Hanmyun Kim, Eun-Jung Kim, Jong-Woo Yoon, Jung-Woo Noh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6205593?pdf=render
id doaj-1d304e8570cd4ec29ea64d39c5067119
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d304e8570cd4ec29ea64d39c50671192020-11-24T21:08:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011310e020463010.1371/journal.pone.0204630Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.Yoo Jin ChoiYoung-Ki LeeHayne Cho ParkEun Yi KimAjin ChoChaehoon HanSun Ryoung ChoiHanmyun KimEun-Jung KimJong-Woo YoonJung-Woo NohBACKGROUND:The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines recommend intra-access flow (Qa) measurement as the preferred vascular access surveillance method over static intra-access pressure ratio (SIAPR). Recently, it has become possible to perform Qa measurement during hemodialysis using thermodilution method called blood temperature monitoring (BTM) with the Twister device. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between Qa by BTM and SIAPR and to compare the performance of two tests in prediction of vascular access stenosis. METHODS:The study was performed from January 2016 to November 2017 and included 97 patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Qa by BTM and SIAPR were simultaneously measured every 1~3 months with a total of 449 measurements during study period. RESULTS:In our study population, mean age was 59.9±10.0 years and 61.9% were diabetes. The mean Qa obtained by BTM was 1186±588 mL/min. There was no correlation between Qa by BTM and venous SIAPR (r = 0.061, P = 0.196). Angiography identified 36 stenotic AVFs (37.1%) among the study subjects. They included 13 cases with only inflow stenosis, 6 with only outflow stenosis, and 17 with stenosis on both sides. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that Qa by BTM had higher discriminative ability to diagnose vascular access stenosis compared to SIAPR (P <0.001). The Qa less than 583 mL/min showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in vascular stenosis prediction. CONCLUSION:Intradialytic measurement of Qa by BTM showed better diagnostic power over venous SIAPR in prediction of vascular access stenosis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6205593?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yoo Jin Choi
Young-Ki Lee
Hayne Cho Park
Eun Yi Kim
Ajin Cho
Chaehoon Han
Sun Ryoung Choi
Hanmyun Kim
Eun-Jung Kim
Jong-Woo Yoon
Jung-Woo Noh
spellingShingle Yoo Jin Choi
Young-Ki Lee
Hayne Cho Park
Eun Yi Kim
Ajin Cho
Chaehoon Han
Sun Ryoung Choi
Hanmyun Kim
Eun-Jung Kim
Jong-Woo Yoon
Jung-Woo Noh
Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yoo Jin Choi
Young-Ki Lee
Hayne Cho Park
Eun Yi Kim
Ajin Cho
Chaehoon Han
Sun Ryoung Choi
Hanmyun Kim
Eun-Jung Kim
Jong-Woo Yoon
Jung-Woo Noh
author_sort Yoo Jin Choi
title Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
title_short Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
title_full Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
title_fullStr Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of vascular access stenosis: Blood temperature monitoring with the Twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
title_sort prediction of vascular access stenosis: blood temperature monitoring with the twister versus static intra-access pressure ratio.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines recommend intra-access flow (Qa) measurement as the preferred vascular access surveillance method over static intra-access pressure ratio (SIAPR). Recently, it has become possible to perform Qa measurement during hemodialysis using thermodilution method called blood temperature monitoring (BTM) with the Twister device. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between Qa by BTM and SIAPR and to compare the performance of two tests in prediction of vascular access stenosis. METHODS:The study was performed from January 2016 to November 2017 and included 97 patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Qa by BTM and SIAPR were simultaneously measured every 1~3 months with a total of 449 measurements during study period. RESULTS:In our study population, mean age was 59.9±10.0 years and 61.9% were diabetes. The mean Qa obtained by BTM was 1186±588 mL/min. There was no correlation between Qa by BTM and venous SIAPR (r = 0.061, P = 0.196). Angiography identified 36 stenotic AVFs (37.1%) among the study subjects. They included 13 cases with only inflow stenosis, 6 with only outflow stenosis, and 17 with stenosis on both sides. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that Qa by BTM had higher discriminative ability to diagnose vascular access stenosis compared to SIAPR (P <0.001). The Qa less than 583 mL/min showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in vascular stenosis prediction. CONCLUSION:Intradialytic measurement of Qa by BTM showed better diagnostic power over venous SIAPR in prediction of vascular access stenosis.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6205593?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yoojinchoi predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT youngkilee predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT haynechopark predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT eunyikim predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT ajincho predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT chaehoonhan predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT sunryoungchoi predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT hanmyunkim predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT eunjungkim predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT jongwooyoon predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
AT jungwoonoh predictionofvascularaccessstenosisbloodtemperaturemonitoringwiththetwisterversusstaticintraaccesspressureratio
_version_ 1716760474752647168