Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy

This paper examines the way political responsibility is constructed through discourse by Romanian politicians in the Web 2.0 era. Drawing on an analytical framework proposed by Augoustinos, Hastie and Wright (2011), based on discursive psychology, and critical discourse analysis, this paper analyses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: FlorenţaTOADER
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bucharest Publishing House 2016-11-01
Series:Styles of Communication
Subjects:
CDA
Online Access:https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzdHlsZXNvZmNvbW18Z3g6NjlkMTIzODU1NDk5OWE1Mw
id doaj-1d41877157724e1eafc63e3690978521
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d41877157724e1eafc63e36909785212020-11-24T23:39:14ZengUniversity of Bucharest Publishing HouseStyles of Communication2065-79432067-564X2016-11-01824261Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National TragedyFlorenţaTOADER0National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, RomaniaThis paper examines the way political responsibility is constructed through discourse by Romanian politicians in the Web 2.0 era. Drawing on an analytical framework proposed by Augoustinos, Hastie and Wright (2011), based on discursive psychology, and critical discourse analysis, this paper analyses the Facebook messages released by the main political actors in Romania, after the Colectiv nightclub fire. The empirical endeavour is guided by two research objectives: to analyse the discursive strategies used to create discursive identities, to assign political responsibility and to express solidarity with the victims; and to analyse a specific kind of rhetoric, the political apology, focusing on its pragmatic and linguistic features and on the emotion categories (empathy, sympathy, anger, guilt, sadness) deployed to deliver the apology. The results of the study show that when faced with a situation where the offender is hard to define, political actors prefer the use of another speech act: the expression of solidarity and compassion. While the political apology is offered only after and explicit demand, the expression of solidarity is offered promptly and willingly.https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzdHlsZXNvZmNvbW18Z3g6NjlkMTIzODU1NDk5OWE1Mwpolitical apologydiscourse analysisCDARomania
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author FlorenţaTOADER
spellingShingle FlorenţaTOADER
Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy
Styles of Communication
political apology
discourse analysis
CDA
Romania
author_facet FlorenţaTOADER
author_sort FlorenţaTOADER
title Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy
title_short Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy
title_full Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy
title_fullStr Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy
title_full_unstemmed Negotiating Political Responsibility in Times of National Tragedy
title_sort negotiating political responsibility in times of national tragedy
publisher University of Bucharest Publishing House
series Styles of Communication
issn 2065-7943
2067-564X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description This paper examines the way political responsibility is constructed through discourse by Romanian politicians in the Web 2.0 era. Drawing on an analytical framework proposed by Augoustinos, Hastie and Wright (2011), based on discursive psychology, and critical discourse analysis, this paper analyses the Facebook messages released by the main political actors in Romania, after the Colectiv nightclub fire. The empirical endeavour is guided by two research objectives: to analyse the discursive strategies used to create discursive identities, to assign political responsibility and to express solidarity with the victims; and to analyse a specific kind of rhetoric, the political apology, focusing on its pragmatic and linguistic features and on the emotion categories (empathy, sympathy, anger, guilt, sadness) deployed to deliver the apology. The results of the study show that when faced with a situation where the offender is hard to define, political actors prefer the use of another speech act: the expression of solidarity and compassion. While the political apology is offered only after and explicit demand, the expression of solidarity is offered promptly and willingly.
topic political apology
discourse analysis
CDA
Romania
url https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzdHlsZXNvZmNvbW18Z3g6NjlkMTIzODU1NDk5OWE1Mw
work_keys_str_mv AT florentatoader negotiatingpoliticalresponsibilityintimesofnationaltragedy
_version_ 1725514605829029888