Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise

In this paper, I argue that many arguments from expert opinion are strong arguments. Therefore, in many cases it is rational to rely on experts since in many cases the fact that an expert says that p makes it highly likely that p is true. I will defend this claim by providing 5 arguments that illumi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Markus Seidel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2014-06-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3886
id doaj-1d44492e03fc42c2a99c91c9ee46ec03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d44492e03fc42c2a99c91c9ee46ec032021-06-14T17:00:38ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2014-06-01342Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About ExpertiseMarkus Seidel0Center for Philosophy of Science University of Muenster Domplatz 6 48143 Muenster GermanyIn this paper, I argue that many arguments from expert opinion are strong arguments. Therefore, in many cases it is rational to rely on experts since in many cases the fact that an expert says that p makes it highly likely that p is true. I will defend this claim by providing 5 arguments that illuminate and elaborate on 5 crucial claims about expertise. In this way, I aim to undermine recent attempts to establish a rampant scepticism about arguments from expert opinion.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3886arguments from authorityexpertiseexpert opinion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markus Seidel
spellingShingle Markus Seidel
Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
Informal Logic
arguments from authority
expertise
expert opinion
author_facet Markus Seidel
author_sort Markus Seidel
title Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
title_short Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
title_full Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
title_fullStr Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
title_full_unstemmed Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
title_sort throwing the baby out with the water: from reasonably scrutinizing authorities to rampant scepticism about expertise
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2014-06-01
description In this paper, I argue that many arguments from expert opinion are strong arguments. Therefore, in many cases it is rational to rely on experts since in many cases the fact that an expert says that p makes it highly likely that p is true. I will defend this claim by providing 5 arguments that illuminate and elaborate on 5 crucial claims about expertise. In this way, I aim to undermine recent attempts to establish a rampant scepticism about arguments from expert opinion.
topic arguments from authority
expertise
expert opinion
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3886
work_keys_str_mv AT markusseidel throwingthebabyoutwiththewaterfromreasonablyscrutinizingauthoritiestorampantscepticismaboutexpertise
_version_ 1721378106251411456