Political communication in post-truth society

The research behind this paper is set in the context of the 2016 US presidential election that has come to symbolize the post-truth era. We conducted a literature review on the 2016 election, with the aim to better understand the impact of computational propaganda on the election outcome and on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nina Gorenc
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts) 2020-06-01
Series:Ars & Humanitas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/9361
id doaj-1d71197e143d42e3a2ecbb5a33261c8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d71197e143d42e3a2ecbb5a33261c8b2021-04-02T12:58:48ZdeuZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)Ars & Humanitas1854-96322350-42182020-06-0114110.4312/ars.14.1.73-87Political communication in post-truth societyNina Gorenc0University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Slovenia The research behind this paper is set in the context of the 2016 US presidential election that has come to symbolize the post-truth era. We conducted a literature review on the 2016 election, with the aim to better understand the impact of computational propaganda on the election outcome and on the behaviour of voters. The paper opens with a definition of post-truth society and related concepts such as fake news and computational propaganda. It explores the changes of political communication in a digital environment and analyses the role of social media in the 2016 election. It probes into phenomena such as the trivialization of politics and the loss of credibility of political actors, which are both common in post-truth societies. The reviewed literature seems to indicate that social media have become strong actors on the political stage, but so far not the predominant source of political information and influence on the behaviour of voters. The paper makes two important contributions. Firstly, drawing on the concept of post-truth society, it analyses the role of computational propaganda in the 2016 presidential election, and secondly, it attempts to explain the paradox of general political apathy on one hand, and increased political activism on the other. These are some of the challenges we are now facing, and in order to be able to cope with them it is important to acknowledge and understand them. https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/9361political communicationpost-truthfake newscomputational propagandabots
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nina Gorenc
spellingShingle Nina Gorenc
Political communication in post-truth society
Ars & Humanitas
political communication
post-truth
fake news
computational propaganda
bots
author_facet Nina Gorenc
author_sort Nina Gorenc
title Political communication in post-truth society
title_short Political communication in post-truth society
title_full Political communication in post-truth society
title_fullStr Political communication in post-truth society
title_full_unstemmed Political communication in post-truth society
title_sort political communication in post-truth society
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)
series Ars & Humanitas
issn 1854-9632
2350-4218
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The research behind this paper is set in the context of the 2016 US presidential election that has come to symbolize the post-truth era. We conducted a literature review on the 2016 election, with the aim to better understand the impact of computational propaganda on the election outcome and on the behaviour of voters. The paper opens with a definition of post-truth society and related concepts such as fake news and computational propaganda. It explores the changes of political communication in a digital environment and analyses the role of social media in the 2016 election. It probes into phenomena such as the trivialization of politics and the loss of credibility of political actors, which are both common in post-truth societies. The reviewed literature seems to indicate that social media have become strong actors on the political stage, but so far not the predominant source of political information and influence on the behaviour of voters. The paper makes two important contributions. Firstly, drawing on the concept of post-truth society, it analyses the role of computational propaganda in the 2016 presidential election, and secondly, it attempts to explain the paradox of general political apathy on one hand, and increased political activism on the other. These are some of the challenges we are now facing, and in order to be able to cope with them it is important to acknowledge and understand them.
topic political communication
post-truth
fake news
computational propaganda
bots
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/9361
work_keys_str_mv AT ninagorenc politicalcommunicationinposttruthsociety
_version_ 1721566923814076416