Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges

Bridge tests are a helpful tool for bridge assessment and evaluation. Both in the case of a static and dynamic load testing, each element of the test: the load selection and application, the creation of a numerical model to follow the progress of the test or to check the validity of the test results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piotr Olaszek, Joan Ramon Casas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Built Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00011/full
id doaj-1da4f4f3c4e5471592ff02c7dd2f1b27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1da4f4f3c4e5471592ff02c7dd2f1b272020-11-25T00:46:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Built Environment2297-33622019-02-01510.3389/fbuil.2019.00011436502Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of BridgesPiotr Olaszek0Joan Ramon Casas1Road and Bridge Research Institute, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, SpainBridge tests are a helpful tool for bridge assessment and evaluation. Both in the case of a static and dynamic load testing, each element of the test: the load selection and application, the creation of a numerical model to follow the progress of the test or to check the validity of the test results, the measurement process itself and the comparative analysis of experimental results and calculations could be a source of errors in the bridge final evaluation if these errors and uncertainties are not properly considered. The article presents some of the most important factors that may bring errors in the interpretation of the test results and their comparison to targeted values or values derived from a numerical model. This, at the end, may result in the adoption of decisions that are not accurate and appropriate. The selected sources of feasible errors are presented with the division into static and dynamic loading tests. The presented examples of bridge load testing show how the use of improper test methods could lead to significant errors in bridge assessment and evaluation and, consequently, to wrong decisions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00011/fullbridgesdiagnosticproofstaticdynamicload testing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Piotr Olaszek
Joan Ramon Casas
spellingShingle Piotr Olaszek
Joan Ramon Casas
Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges
Frontiers in Built Environment
bridges
diagnostic
proof
static
dynamic
load testing
author_facet Piotr Olaszek
Joan Ramon Casas
author_sort Piotr Olaszek
title Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges
title_short Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges
title_full Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges
title_fullStr Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges
title_full_unstemmed Practical Considerations Regarding Results From Static and Dynamic Load Testing of Bridges
title_sort practical considerations regarding results from static and dynamic load testing of bridges
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Built Environment
issn 2297-3362
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Bridge tests are a helpful tool for bridge assessment and evaluation. Both in the case of a static and dynamic load testing, each element of the test: the load selection and application, the creation of a numerical model to follow the progress of the test or to check the validity of the test results, the measurement process itself and the comparative analysis of experimental results and calculations could be a source of errors in the bridge final evaluation if these errors and uncertainties are not properly considered. The article presents some of the most important factors that may bring errors in the interpretation of the test results and their comparison to targeted values or values derived from a numerical model. This, at the end, may result in the adoption of decisions that are not accurate and appropriate. The selected sources of feasible errors are presented with the division into static and dynamic loading tests. The presented examples of bridge load testing show how the use of improper test methods could lead to significant errors in bridge assessment and evaluation and, consequently, to wrong decisions.
topic bridges
diagnostic
proof
static
dynamic
load testing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00011/full
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrolaszek practicalconsiderationsregardingresultsfromstaticanddynamicloadtestingofbridges
AT joanramoncasas practicalconsiderationsregardingresultsfromstaticanddynamicloadtestingofbridges
_version_ 1725266383794601984