A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality

Background and objectives: Health disparities are a growing concern in health care. Research provides ample evidence of bias in patient care and mistrust between patient and providers in ways that could perpetuate health care disparities. This study aimed to review existing literature on implicit bi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oluwabunmi Ogungbe, Amal K. Mitra, Joni K. Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ibrahim Medical College 2019-06-01
Series:IMC Journal of Medical Science
Online Access:http://www.imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/315
id doaj-1dadb431d4d042caae2b000c9f0ffea2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dadb431d4d042caae2b000c9f0ffea22020-11-25T01:08:09ZengIbrahim Medical CollegeIMC Journal of Medical Science2519-17212519-15862019-06-01131116A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionalityOluwabunmi Ogungbe 0Amal K. Mitra 1Joni K. Roberts 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi 39213, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi 39213, USADepartment of Behavioral and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi 39213, USABackground and objectives: Health disparities are a growing concern in health care. Research provides ample evidence of bias in patient care and mistrust between patient and providers in ways that could perpetuate health care disparities. This study aimed to review existing literature on implicit bias (or unconscious bias) in healthcare settings and determine studies that have considered adverse effects of bias of more than one domain of social identity (e.g., race and gender bias) in health care. Methods: This is a systematic review of articles using databases such as EBSCO, Embase, CINAHL, COCHRANE, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, Pub Med, and Web of Science. Search terms included implicit bias, unconscious bias, healthcare, and public health. The inclusion criteria included studies that assessed implicit bias in a healthcare setting, written in English, and published from 1997-2018. Results: Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria – 15 of which examined race implicit bias, ten examined weight bias, four assessed race and social class, two examined sexual orientation, two focused on mental illness, one measured race and sexual orientation, and another investigated age bias. Conclusions: Studies that measured more than one domain of social identity of an individual did so separately without investigating how the domains overlapped. Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a widely used psychological test which is used to determine existence of an implicit bias in an individual. However, this study did not find any use of an instrument that could assess implicit bias toward multiple domains of social identities. Because of possible multiplicative effects of several biases affecting a single entity, this study suggests the importance of developing a tool in measuring intersectionality of biases. IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 005. EPub date: 13 March 2019 Address for Correspondence: Amal K. Mitra, Professor of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, 350 West Woodrow Wilson Drive, Room 216,Jackson, MS 39213; e-mail: amal.k.mitra@jsums.eduhttp://www.imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/315
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oluwabunmi Ogungbe
Amal K. Mitra
Joni K. Roberts
spellingShingle Oluwabunmi Ogungbe
Amal K. Mitra
Joni K. Roberts
A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality
IMC Journal of Medical Science
author_facet Oluwabunmi Ogungbe
Amal K. Mitra
Joni K. Roberts
author_sort Oluwabunmi Ogungbe
title A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality
title_short A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality
title_full A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality
title_fullStr A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality
title_sort systematic review of implicit bias in health care: a call for intersectionality
publisher Ibrahim Medical College
series IMC Journal of Medical Science
issn 2519-1721
2519-1586
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background and objectives: Health disparities are a growing concern in health care. Research provides ample evidence of bias in patient care and mistrust between patient and providers in ways that could perpetuate health care disparities. This study aimed to review existing literature on implicit bias (or unconscious bias) in healthcare settings and determine studies that have considered adverse effects of bias of more than one domain of social identity (e.g., race and gender bias) in health care. Methods: This is a systematic review of articles using databases such as EBSCO, Embase, CINAHL, COCHRANE, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, Pub Med, and Web of Science. Search terms included implicit bias, unconscious bias, healthcare, and public health. The inclusion criteria included studies that assessed implicit bias in a healthcare setting, written in English, and published from 1997-2018. Results: Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria – 15 of which examined race implicit bias, ten examined weight bias, four assessed race and social class, two examined sexual orientation, two focused on mental illness, one measured race and sexual orientation, and another investigated age bias. Conclusions: Studies that measured more than one domain of social identity of an individual did so separately without investigating how the domains overlapped. Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a widely used psychological test which is used to determine existence of an implicit bias in an individual. However, this study did not find any use of an instrument that could assess implicit bias toward multiple domains of social identities. Because of possible multiplicative effects of several biases affecting a single entity, this study suggests the importance of developing a tool in measuring intersectionality of biases. IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 005. EPub date: 13 March 2019 Address for Correspondence: Amal K. Mitra, Professor of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, 350 West Woodrow Wilson Drive, Room 216,Jackson, MS 39213; e-mail: amal.k.mitra@jsums.edu
url http://www.imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/315
work_keys_str_mv AT oluwabunmiogungbe asystematicreviewofimplicitbiasinhealthcareacallforintersectionality
AT amalkmitra asystematicreviewofimplicitbiasinhealthcareacallforintersectionality
AT jonikroberts asystematicreviewofimplicitbiasinhealthcareacallforintersectionality
AT oluwabunmiogungbe systematicreviewofimplicitbiasinhealthcareacallforintersectionality
AT amalkmitra systematicreviewofimplicitbiasinhealthcareacallforintersectionality
AT jonikroberts systematicreviewofimplicitbiasinhealthcareacallforintersectionality
_version_ 1725183984526163968